Officer Report Summary Form

Planning Report and Recommendations General Report Site Visited YES/NO 1. The site is not defined with a red line, but, since the application is stated to be an amendment of 03/16/46, the site may be taken to comprise the curtailage of Tesco's supermarket, as in that application. 2. PA 03/16/46 was refused for reasons relating to the boundary fencing, without prejudice to the use of matching walling. 3. Matching walling is now proposed. 4. The enclosed area is larger, such as to accommodate a turning area for the trucks, but the consequential reduction in parking should be offset by a reduction in car-borne customers. Signed Date 10.6.04 Summary of objections/views LA - no objection Recommendations Approve/Refuse Signed Date 10.6.04 {{table:84528}}