15 June 2021 · Committee
Port Erin Beach, Shore Road, Port Erin, Isle Of Man, IM9 6hh
Permission was granted for the erection of 12 temporary timber beach huts on a section of Port Erin Beach, Shore Road, Port Erin. The huts would be in place seasonally each year, from 28 March to 31 October, and then removed. The site sits north of Leading Light Lighthouse, near Cosy Nook Café and the end of Shore Road, on sandy beach with a stone wall to the east and a steep grass bank rising to the promenade. The officer recommended approval, and the application was decided by committee. Key planning issues examined included the principle of developing this beach location, the impact on the harbour area, the effect on the character and appearance of the site and the nearby proposed Conservation Area, and potential flooding impacts. The application was permitted on 15 June 2021.
The application was permitted by committee on 15 June 2021. The officer recommended approval, and the key planning issues considered included the principle of development on the site, the impact on the harbour area, the effect on the character and appearance of the site and the proposed Conservation Area, and flooding impacts.
Development in or around harbours should neither compromise the ability of the harbour to accommodate other commercial or recreational users in a viable manner, nor be detrimental to the character of those harbours of historic interest.
accord with the principles
Transport Policy 13: Development in or around harbours should neither compromise the ability of the harbour to accommodate other commercial or recreational users in a viable manner, nor be detrimental to the character of those harbours of historic interest.
Any proposed schemes likely to impact upon the ecology and/or archaeology of a harbour or the nearby coastline should be accompanied by an Environmental Impact Assessment.
accord with the principles
Transport Policy 14: Any proposed schemes likely to impact upon the ecology and/or archaeology of a harbour or the nearby coastline should be accompanied by an Environmental Impact Assessment. 11.8 Drainage 11.8.1 All new development must be capable of being drained of foul and surface water in a safe, convenient, and environmentally acceptable manner. The Department of Transport Drainage Division is the All-Island Drainage Authority and assumes responsibility for all of the Island's public sewers and treatment works, with a number of local authorities acting as Agents within their particular town, village, or parish. As well as maintaining and improving existing infrastructure, the Drainage Division inspects the proposed drainage plans for new development in order to ensure that the completed works are in accordance with the flow and treatment capacity of the system into which they will link and are, where appropriate, of an adoptable standard. 11.8.2 The Drainage Division should be consulted rega rding the potential requirement for attenuation of surface water flows. The Drainage Division has responsibilities under the Land Drainage Act 1934 for Main Rivers, watercourses and ditches. The Division must be consulted in relation to any work affecting a watercourse. 11.8.3 Implementation of the IRIS Masterplan - Integration and Recycling of the Island's Sewage - is well under way and when operational will allow the sewage from local networks to be transmitted to the central treatment site at Meary V eg before being discharged as environmentally acceptable effluent. This will result in the discontinuation of inland treatment works and sea outfalls and reduce the need for private treatment works and septic tanks, and as such the Department of Transport Drainage Division recommends that resources are not spent now on sewage treatment facilities which will be de -commissioned once IRIS is in operation - the Division will itself direct resources to IRIS as a priority. Details of the IRIS system are included in the Department of Transport Drainage Division Policy. The Sewage Treatment Works at Meary Veg is now operational, and further phases of the overall scheme are currently subject to review. 11.8.4 It is recognised however that development will be required in the period before IRIS is fully operational, and therefore interim measures such as individual treatment works may be appropriate if a suitable watercourse is available to accept the discharge from the system and the development will result in an appropria te number of dwellings being connected to the works. In areas which are beyond the final extent of IRIS - in general it will connect those areas currently served by mains drainage - development is likely to be limited in order to reduce reliance upon indiv idual septic tanks. The discharge standards for stand -alone treatment works will vary and must be discussed with the Environmental Protection Unit of DLGE (not the Drainage Division), taking into account the Water Pollution Act. Sustainable urban drainage systems should be discussed with the Drainage Division in advance of any detailed planning application being submitted. An adoption agreement must be entered into with the relevant local authority for the long term maintenance of these facilities prior to obtaining planning approval. 11.8.5 Developers are encouraged to consult the Drainage Division regarding capacity within the existing sewerage system prior to submitting planning application. Drainage master plans are required for large scale developments. 11.8.6 The Drainage Division should be consulted in relation to any new industrial development since this will require a Trade Effluent Discharge Consent to be issued to comply with the Sewerage Act 1999. The Division will also advise where there are capacity constraints within the existing sewerage system that would restrict industrial development to "Dry Industrial" i.e. domestic sewerage flows only. 11.8.7 Sewers which are required to be adopted by the Department of Transport must comply with Manx Sewers for Adoption. Infrastructure Policy 1: With the exception of individual plots or very small -scale schemes (equivalent in scale to an individual plot), development shall only take place in areas which will ultimately be connected to the IRIS system. Infrastructure Policy 2: Full details of all interim drainage arrangements for development in areas awaiting connection to IRIS shall be submitted to and approved by the Department of Local Government and the Environment before development is commenced. 11.8.8 Development may in the future be proposed for sites which are known to have flooded in the past, usually by virtue of raised river or sea levels and beca use of inadequate drainage systems. The development of sites which may flood can lead to problems not only for the new development itself, but also for adjacent land and property as a result of alterations to surface water drains and increased run-off from new hard surfaces. Environmental Policy 10 relates to development on sites with a potential risk of flooding. Guidance on the preparation of flood risk assessments is included in Appendix 4. 11.9 Communications 11.9.1 The Communications Commission has the statutory responsibility for the regulation of telecommunications and broadcasting on the Isle of Man and for keeping a watching brief on broadcasting to the Island. The Department of Home Affairs Communication Division has the responsibility for the provision management and maintenance of the Government's radio systems including those used by the Emergency Services. 11.9.2 The maintenance and improvement of these systems is likely to require the provision of new infrastructure; infrastructure required by private telecommunications operators is likely to be more extensive. It is important that a balance be struck between the need for new, evolving communications systems to satisfy residential and business demand and the impact that the necessary infrastructure will have upon the environment. New communications development should be in accordance with the provisions of this plan. 11.9.3 A Committee which includes representations from all interested parties has been established to co-ordinate the use and development of communication masts and infrastructure. The Government Plan 2004/7 includes a proposal to increase mast sharing by operators. Infrastructure Policy 3: A balance must be struck between the need for new, evolving communications systems to satisfy residential and business demand and the impact that the necessary infrastructure will have upon the environment. Measures which may help to achieve a satisfactory balance will include a presumption against visually intrusive masts in sensitive landscapes, the encouragement of mast sharing by different operators, and the removal of redundant infrastructure. Exceptions to this policy would need to demonstrate a strategic national need, which cannot be otherwise secured by mast sharing or alternative locations. 11.10 Water Supply and Water Conservation 11.10.1 The Strategic Objectives stress the need to protect and re-use scarce resources. In an Island community this should extend to protecting the quality and quantity of all waters including marine water s, surface water and groundwater. The Environment Chapter outlines the importance of water to the creation and maintenance of the Island's landscape and ecology. Equally important is the provision of an adequate supply of drinking water and the infrastructure to deliver it. The Isle of Man Water Authority has a duty to provide a supply of wholesome water for the domestic purposes of all premises within the compulsory area of supply. Like most jurisdictions the
Where development is proposed outside of, but close to, the boundary of a Conservation Area, this will only be permitted where it will not detrimentally affect important views into and out of the Conservation Area.
comply with
Environment Policy 36: Where development is proposed outside of, but close to, the boundary of a Conservation Area, this will only be permitted where it will not detrimentally affect important views into and out of the Conservation Area. 7.31 Advertisements in Conservation Areas 7.31.1 Some advertisements found and proposed in Conservation Areas are inappropriate and do not reflect the special character and designation of the area. The design of advertisements should respect the physical appearance of the premises in order to integrate re adily with its surroundings. Traditional details, hanging signs and hand painted signage are most appropriate and will be encouraged.
Where development is proposed on any site where in the opinion of the Department of Local Government and the Environment there is a potential risk of flooding, a flood risk assessment and details of proposed mitigation measures must accompany any application for planning permission.
limit any significant flood risk in line with
irements of the relevant gas supply agency. Flood Risk 63 There was widespread concern about the adequacy of drainage and the risk of flooding, particularly in parts of Braddan, Onchan and Laxey. Environment Policy 10 of the Strategic Plan indicates that where development is proposed on any site where there is a potential risk of flooding, the prospective developer will be required to submit a flood risk assessment, together with details of proposed mitigation measures. This approach is reinforced in Utilities Proposal 6 of the draft Area Plan, which (among other things) requires the incorporation of Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS) into new developments, to attenuate the rate of surface water run-off. I consider these policies to be reasonable. Clearly, without adequate mitigation measures, new building should normally be resisted on land which is at serious risk of flooding, or where the proposed development would increase the flood risk elsewhere. 64 In my view, the format of Utilities Proposal 6 could be improved. First, as a Proposal of the Area Plan, I consider that it should be in a bold typeface, to differentiate it from the supporting text. (The same applies to a number of other policies e.g. Transport Policy 2, and Utilities Policies 2 and 5). Second, there appears to be an error of syntax at the start of the second sentence of Utilities Proposal 6, which should perhaps read 'Strategies to achieve this will include …'. Third, the third bullet point of this Proposal introduces SuDS. Subsequent bullet points describe features of SuDS, and are therefore subordinate to the third bullet point. For clarity, I consider that they should be indented. I recommend that the draft Area Plan be modified accordingly. Sewage Treatment 65 There was also some public concern about the adequacy of the sewerage system, both in terms of its capacity to accommodate the effluent from proposed residential development areas, and in terms of the current practice of discharging untreated sewage into the sea. Infrastructure Policy 1 of the Strategic Plan indicates that developments entailing the erection of multiple dwellings should take place only on sites that will ultimately be connected to the IRIS system, which takes sewage to a treatment works at Meary Veg. (IRIS is an acronym for Integration and Recycling of the Island's Sewage). However, as long ago as 2006/7, a review was undertaken to decide whether to continue with the IRIS strategy. This concluded that it would be beneficial to adopt a regional sewage treatment strategy (RSTS) for those settlements that were not already connected to the IRIS system, including Laxey, Baldrine and settlements in the Central Valley. To that extent, Infrastructure Policy 1 of the Strategic Plan is now out of date. 66 I understand that a planning application will soon be submitted for the development of a local sewage treatment facility for Laxey. Feasibility studies for the provision of a similar facility to serve Baldrine are ongoing. A replacement sewage works at Ballagarey, serving part of the Central Valley became operational in 2018. However, capacity limitations mean that planned development in Crosby is likely to have to rely on standalone sewage treatment for the time being, until the existing treatment works is replaced as anticipated in 2022. The Programme for Government (2016-2021) indicates an intention to complete the regional sewage treatment infrastructure within the lifetime of the present administration. 67 It seems to me that these considerations should be taken into account in the allocation and phasing of land for development. I will return to this matter when considering the draft Area Plan's proposals for housing. Electricity Renewable Energy 68 Peel Energy considered that the Area Plan should contain a detailed and specific chapter on renewable energy, providing measurable criteria against which applications for the development of renewable power generating facilities would be assessed. They cited the States of Jersey Island Plan 2011, which includes such material. And they pointed out that a Climate Change Emergency has recently been declared on the Isle of Man; that a Climate Change Bill is soon to be presented to Tynwald; and that there has been strong public support for the Government's Climate Change Mitigation Strategy. They argued that, in failing to provide detailed guidance on renewable power generation, the Area Plan was inconsistent with the Strategic Plan; and that since the Area Plan post-dated the Strategic Plan, its largely negative provisions would prevail. 69 Energy Policy 4 of the Strategic Plan applies to development proposals for renewable energy generated by wind, water, tidal or solar power. It indicates that any such proposals will be judged against that Plan's environmental objectives. Proposals for wind, water or tidal power would need to be supported by an Environmental Impact Assessment. The supporting text indicates that renewable energy schemes will be given similar scrutiny as is gi
Development which would result in an unacceptable risk from flooding, either on or off-site, will not be permitted.
limit any significant flood risk in line with
Environment Policy 13: Development which would result in an unacceptable risk from flooding, either on or off-site, will not be permitted. 7.13. Agriculture 7.13.1. Agriculture is an integral and vital part of the rural economy and rural society and to a great degree is responsible for the appearance and stewardship of the countryside. The Island's farms not only provide the community with a healthy proportion of meat and vegetable produce but also provide employment opportunities. It is important to sustain agric ultural industry by safeguarding its prime resources, by allowing appropriately designed and sited new buildings (where need is established) and by encouraging conservation -based land management regimes (including appropriate tree and shrub planting). Howe ver, this must not be at the expense of the appearance and character or openness of the landscape, or result in the loss of traditional hedgerows and field boundaries or the loss of limited areas of good quality agricultural land. A recent study on agricultural soils on the Isle of Man (1) revealed that the majority of the agricultural land on the Island (80.26%) fell within Class 3, based on the land use capability class system in England and Wales (classes range from Class 1 to 5, with Class 1 being the mo st versatile land). Class 3 land characteristics can be summarised as land with moderate limitations which restrict the choice of crops and/or demand careful management. Only 4.87% of agricultural land falls within Classes 1 and 2. According to the agricultural land use capability map (figure 4 of the study), all of the Class 1/2 land of which Class 1 is the dominant class can be found in the south of the Island to the east of Ballasalla. New Area Plans will include a general presumption against the rel ease of Class 1 and 2 agricultural land for development. The highest level of protection will apply to the highest graded quality of land with Classes 1 and 2 soils being afforded most protection from development and being taken out of agricultural use. Where there is a proposal to develop land which is categorised in the Agricultural Soils of the Isle of Man report as being mixed Classes 2 and 3, those wishing to develop the land should ascertain which parts of the site represent higher grade of soil wi th these parts being avoided for development purposes. 7.13.2 One of the prime considerations in the determination of development proposals in the countryside will continue to be the conservation and enhancement of the landscape. In terms of the di versification of farms and farm buildings, there may be some circumstances where this may be appropriate and it is acknowledged that small scale enterprises can promote healthy economic activity in rural areas whether this be for commercial, industrial, tourism, sport or recreation uses. There is, however, a general presumption against the introduction of new uses into the countryside (including industrial or office uses): (a) for which there is no local need; (b) which would materially effect the rural character of an area; (c) which would necessitate the creation of new buildings; and (d) which would be more appropriate in industrial zones, business parks or within urban centres. 7.13.3 In recent years there has been increasing demand for new development and buildings in the countryside, particularly for new modern agricultural buildings. Such buildings can have, and in a number of areas already have had an adverse effect on the character and appearance of the landscape, particularly when sited in exposed locations away from building groups and on elevated land. It is important that new development should be compatible with the character of the surrounding area, and the need for n ew buildings in the countryside will be balanced against the harm that development may have on the particular environment within which it is proposed. In terms of new agricultural dwellings, permission will not be granted unless real agricultural need is demonstrated and will in every case be assessed in terms of need, sensitive siting, design, and size, and be subject to an agricultural occupancy condition. (1) Agricultural Soils of the Isle of Man, Harris et al, (Centre for Manx Studies) 2001 7.13.4 It is recognised that there have been considerable changes in the economy in the last twenty years. The number of people in full time agricultural employment has reduced for a number of reasons including increased mechanisation, reductions in the number of farms; and increases in the size of farm holdings. In many cases smaller farms have been amalgamated into larger units to increase economic viability. This has often been accompanied by the sale of former farmhouses and cottages to those who do not earn their employment in agriculture. At the same time there has been an increase in part time involvement in farming either where the income from agriculture is supplemented by other employment or where the person's main employment is not in agriculture but they farm on a part time basis. In considering the applications for new houses in the coun tryside the Department will give careful consideration to agriculture justification based on full time employment in agriculture. See also Section 8.9 in Chapter 8 - Housing.