Officer Planning Report

Application No: 30100 Page 1 of ### Planning Report and Recommendations #### General Report Site Visited YES/NO 1. The site comprises the curvilinear or a detached house on Tremode Road. 2. The application proposes, in principle, that a second dwelling should be constructed on the garden at the rear. Indicative plans show not only suggested siting, but also floor plans and three elevations. 3. The issues are, I suggest: (a) the impact on tree design and other existing nearby houses; (b) the adequacy of the environment/space for the new dwelling; and (c) the arrangements for servicing the new dwelling. Signed: Biff Trees may also be affected. Date: 23-6-03 #### Summary of objections/Views - HA - no objection - LA - objection (backland dev't) #### Recommendations - Approve/Refuse - Signed - Date ## Application No: 03/160 #### Planning Report and Recommendations ##### General Report Site Visited YES/NO 1. The garden is overgrown, and there are trees around the edge, extending their canopies well into the space. The track from Tromede Road is gravel, overgrown, and little-used. The egress on to the highway has very limited visibility. 2. Mains drainage can be continued. 3. Other houses would not be, or need not be adversely affected. 4. I judge that the access track and its junction with Tromede Road are poor enough to warrant refusal, and that there is likely to be loss of trees. Signed (eventually, I not immediately). Date: 24.6.03. ##### Summary of objections/Views ##### Recommendations Approve/Refuse This is a highly balanced judgment, but I recommend refusal in accordance with (?) above. Bref Signed Date: 24.6.03