8 December 2010 · Delegated
Garage, Croit E Caley House, Croit E Caley, Colby, Isle Of Man, IM9 4aw
This application sought permission to erect a replacement agricultural building at a field in Colby, Isle of Man, incorporating amendments to a previously approved scheme (reference 09/02037/B). The site was noted in the officer's report as land that was neither actively farmed nor laid out as a domestic garden. The officer recommended the application be permitted. Permission was granted on 8 December 2010 through delegated decision. The available evidence is limited, so further detail on the planning reasoning is not available from the supplied documents.
The application was permitted on 8 December 2010 under delegated authority. The officer recommended approval, and the portal records the outcome as permitted. Limited detail is available from the supporting documents beyond the site observation that the land was neither actively farmed nor laid out as a domestic garden.
general Policy 3 of the Strategic Plan
e Character 'Areas'. The East has 5 of the 9 identifiable landscape 'types' on the Island and 20 of the 59 landscape character 'areas' (see Map 2 'Landscape Assessment Areas' and annotated Map 3 below). Geographically, the coverage of the plan is limited to seven Local Authorities but landscape character and key views do not stop at a Local Authority boundary. There must be an appreciation of our landscape whether looking outwards from the eastern area or towards it. In terms of the Assessment Report, Douglas, Onchan and part of Lonan were identified only as 'Urban' and so not defined by either a landscape Type or Area. Again, the transition from one area to another is unlikely to be rigid but rather a gradual change. This should be noted in any interpretation of the landscape mapping. The findings of the Landscape Character Assessment Report The Landscape Character Assessment, in particular the landscape strategies and key views, have informed a number of proposals that protect specific views and viewpoints. Where there are no specific landscape proposals for an area, the landscape strategies and key views shall be taken to be the policy approach for the area, as set out in Landscape Proposal 1. The strategies and key views concentrate upon the aesthetic nature of 'the view '. The concept of a 'view' is somewhat challenging to identify in a paragraph but the Assessment Report highlights - which has been repeated here - a number of different landscape 'features' that can be identified and distinguished from one area to the next. There is not a statutory right to a view; it is rather a part of the concept of amenity or the charm of an overall setting. It is important therefore that in many places, such views should be recognised and protected from harm. As stated above, w hile each Landscape Character Area identified through the A ssessment Report is valued, some areas require specific proposals due to the particular sensitivity to change and potential harm to their intrinsic landscape qualities that could result from development. Some Landscape Character Areas will have greater capacity to accept new development than others; it may be possible that landscape harm could be mitigated through careful design and landscaping measures. Objectives i. To protect and enhance where possible, the distinctiveness, special features or key views that contribute to the landscape character of identified Landscape Character Areas in the plan area. ii. Ensuring development respects and enhances and causes no adverse effect on, the scenic amenity, landscape features and view corridors of each settlement. iii. To protect landscapes and significant open spaces that contribute to character, identity and sustainable environments. Desired Outcomes i. Sensitive landscape areas are protected so that new development does not detract from their natural quality. ii. Landscape qualities, open space linkages and environmental performance in non -urban areas are improved. iii. The natural landscape is recognised for its ae sthetic value and as a fully functioning system. iv. Key features are protected and enhanced. In order to support these desired outcomes: • All landscapes and locally important views have been identified. • Specific proposals have been made which seek to protect vulnerable views and viewpoints from inappropriate development. • Where proposals support new development sites in this plan, development briefs will require applications for planning approval to provide a landscape assessment where appropriate, showing how the effect of any proposal on the overall landscape setting and appearance has been fully taken into account and how this is mitigated or even integrated into the overall design. An overview of Landscape Character and Appearance in the East The Landscape Character Assessment Report described the landscape character of the East, and this remains a fair description. Starting with the Northern Uplands and the peaks of Slieau Lhean, Slieau Ouyr and Slieau Ruy, these form a ridge separating Maughold and Laxey. Characterised by open moorland and upland streams, the hills then descend towards Laxey Bay, enclosed by the steep, wooded sides of the glen and valley. At Clay Head jagged cliffs lead to a rocky foreshore of Garwick Bay. Gently undulating topography leads through Groudle and Conrhenny towards Onchan, via a dense network of banks, Manx hedges and ditches. The two mile stretch of Douglas Bay dominates the eastern coast and is enclosed by Onchan Head and Douglas Head. The Central Valley stretches from the southern edge of Douglas Bay to St John's, taking in the settlements of Union Mills, Glen Vine and Crosby and forming the Island's indiscernible 'north-south' dividing line. Inland, the valleys of the River Glass and River Dhoo are densely wooded. Further South, the Chibbanagh coniferous plantation just north of Mount Murray is surrounded by gorse and rough grazing, changing to a geometric pattern of fields a
