29 January 2026 · Delegated
Bishopscourt Mansion House, Bishopscourt, Kirk Michael, Isle Of Man, IM6 2ez
This application sought permission to convert an existing garage block at Bishopscourt Mansion House, Kirk Michael, into a covered swimming pool with associated service rooms. The Department of Environment, Food and Agriculture approved the application on 29 January 2026, with the case officer also recommending approval. The site has a substantial planning history, with 14 previous related applications on record. The available evidence does not set out detailed planning reasons for the approval beyond the formal decision.
The Department of Environment, Food and Agriculture approved the application. The officer also recommended approval. No refusal reasons or conditions are recorded in the available evidence.
Proposals for development must: (a) Protect or enhance the fabric and setting of Ancient Monuments, Registered Buildings
the application complies with strategic policy 4
Strategic Policy 4: Proposals for development must: (a) Protect or enhance the fabric and setting of Ancient Monuments, Registered Buildings (1), Conservation Areas (2), buildings and structures within National Heritage Areas and sites of archaeological interest; (b) protect or enhance the landscape quality and nature conservation value of urban as well as rural areas but especially in respect to development adjacent to Areas of Special Scientific Interest and other designations; and (c) not cause or lead to unacceptable environmental pollution or disturbance. 4.3.8 The design of new development can make a positive contribution to the character and appearance of the Island. Recent development has often been criticised for its similarity to developments across the Island and elsewhere - "anywhere" architecture. At the same time some criticise current practice to retain traditional or vernacular designs. As is often the case the truth lies somewhere between the two extremes. All too often proposals for new developments have not taken into account a proper analysis of their context in terms of siting, layout, scale, materials and other factors. At the same time a slavish following of past design idioms, evolved for earlier lifestyles can produce buildings which do not reflect twenty first century lifestyles including accessibility and energy conservation. While there is often a consensus about what constitutes good and poor design, it is notoriously difficult to define or prescribe. 4.3.9 The Department recognises the need to raise the quality of the Island's architecture and built environment and is pursuing this through the development control process and the commissioning of its own schemes and environmental improvements. At the same ti me it appreciates that the debate about good design needs to be broadened to include those who design, construct and finance new development and the wider community as we are all affected by the end product. To this end it welcomes the Isle of Man Arts Co uncil's National Arts Development Strategy 2005 - 2014 which has as one of its objectives, to raise the quality of the Island's architecture and built environment by encouraging debate on architectural standards, town and country planning, urban regenerati on and public art. This Strategy recognises that debate will have to take place over time. 4.3.10 In the meantime, the Department considers that, while there are a number of policies in the Strategic Plan which cover various elements of the design of new development e.g. General Policy 2 (a) -(i), ( m) and (n), and various Housing policies, there is a need for a further statement on the need to secure quality in the design of new development. In the preparation of Area Plans the Department will include development briefs that set out design principles for significant sites including new residential areas. Subsequent planning applications will be required to be accompanied by a Design Statement setting out the way in which the proposal has been designed to take into account its context and how the design principles have been developed. 4.3.11 At the same time as wishing to promote good design in new development the Department recognises that there are an increasing number of alternative styles of housing which draw their design principles from the wish to promote sustainability and energy efficiency. Many of these can be incorporated into both modern and traditional designs but in some cases they produce a completely different structure or form of buildings, for exa mple underground (1)Registered Building is defined in Appendix 1 (2) Conservation Area is defined in Appendix 1 housing. While wishing to conserve the historic landscape of the Island the Department welcomes new styles of housing as long as they take into account the landscape context and the impact on the amenities of the area in which they are si ted. Merely arguing that a new building cannot be seen in public views is not a justification for the relaxation of other policies relating to the location of new development.
Development which is in accordance with the land-use zoning and proposals in the appropriate Area Plan
General Policy 2: Development which is in accordance with the land-use zoning and proposals in the appropriate Area Plan and with other policies of this Strategic Plan will normally be permitted, provided that the development: (a) is in accordance with the design brief in the Area Plan where there is such a brief; (b) respects the site and surroundings in terms of the siting, layout, scale, form, design and landscaping of buildings and the spaces around them; (c) does not affect adversely the character of the surrounding landscape or townscape; (d) does not adversely affect the protected wildlife or locally important habitats on the site or adjacent land, including water courses; (e) does not affect adversely public views of the sea; (f) incorporates where possible existing topography and landscape features, particularly trees and sod banks; (g) does not affect adversely the amenity of local residents or the character of the locality; (h) provides satisfactory amenity standards in itself, including where appropriate safe and convenient access for all highway users, together with adequate parking, servicing and manoeuvring space; (i) does not have an unacceptable effect on road safety or traffic flows on the local highways; (j) can be provided with all necessary services; (k) does not prejudice the use or development of adjoining land in accordance with the appropriate Area Plan; (l) is not on contaminated land or subject to unreasonable risk of erosion or flooding; (m) takes account of community and personal safety and security in the design of buildings and the spaces around them; and (n) is designed having due regard to best practice in reducing energy consumption. 6.3 Development outside of areas zoned for development
The present system of landscape classification of Areas of High Landscape or Coastal Value
the proposals are judged to comply with environment policy 2
d/Governor 's Road junction. Any future applications will be considered on their merits taking into account the proposals set out in this plan and the Strategic Plan (see Maps 3 and 6). Natural Environment Proposal 2 (Green Gap) Between the settlements of Douglas and Onchan in the area straddling Blackberry Lane, development which would erode the separation and detract from the openness between the settlements will not normally be supported. Applications may be considered favourably if reason for an exception can be demonstrated in line with General Policy 3(g). Laxey and Baldrine - Encroaching ribbon development along the A2 C oast Road which connects Laxey and Baldrine has the potential to connect the two settlements. At present this area largely retains its sense of being in the open countryside with clear sea views. Additionally, services for networked water supply and other essential utilities would be difficult to provide for additional development in this area (see Maps 3, 7 and 9). Natural Environment Proposal 3 (Green Gap) Between the settlements of Laxey and Baldrine, development which would erode the separation and detract from the openness between the settlements will not be supported. Glen Vine and Crosby - These two settlements, although proximate in location, are separate and distinct in many ways. Consultation has clearly demonstrated this through the views expressed during the stages of plan development. In cases such as this, the breaks in the urban fabric and the features of nature which provide a sense of openness should be protected from development which would erode this (see Maps 3 and 10). Natural Environment Proposal 4 (Green Gap) Between the settlements of Glen Vine and Crosby, development which would erode the separation and detract from the openness between the settlements is unlikely to be supported. Douglas, Union Mills and Strang (see Maps 3, 4 and 8) Natural Environment Proposal 5 (Green Gap) Between the settlements of and Douglas, Union Mills and Strang, development which would erode the separation and detract from the openness between the settlements is unlikely to be supported. The Upland Environment The Manx Uplands are an iconic part of our landscape and heritage. Reference to the 'sweet mountain air' and 'green hills and rocks' are enshrined in our national anthem and the colours of the heather and gorse are woven into the very fabric of Manx tartan. The hills are a place of great beauty, yet for some they are also a place to work and for others a place to exercise or simply enjoy open space. Our Uplands are also home to plants and animals that whilst familiar to us, are rare and impor tant in a global and European context. Furthermore, the uplands are a rich repository of cultural and archaeological remains, which are sensitive to change and can easily be damaged by inappropriate development. Production of food is an important and obvi ous function of hill land. But surprisingly, the Manx hills provide everyday functions that most people take for granted. Peatlands, which cover most of our hills reduce the impacts of climate change by locking up carbon dioxide, collect and filter our drinking water and slow the passage of rainfall into streams and rivers, thus reducing downstream flood risk. These multiple uses are of great benefit to the economy of the Isle of Man and the well - being of its people. It is important that the hills continue to provide these benefits long into the future. Ensuring sustainable management of such a wide range of uses to the satisfaction of all interested parties whilst retaining functions essential to the well -being of the Isle of Man is of paramount importance. The Isle of Man Government is the owner and landlord for the majority of the Uplands in the East region and is therefore in a position to implement policy which will deliver the optimum range of ecosystem services. Appropriate and positive Upland management such as controlled rotational burning/cutting of heather and low intensity grazing helps to reduce the fuel load of the hill, provides firebreaks and reduces the risk of unplanned wildfires that further protects the biodiversity of the site, but also the vast amounts of carbon locked away in the peat soils. The majority of this work is carried out by The Department of Environment, Food & Agriculture's grazing and shooting tenants. The Manx Uplands are critically important from a habitat and biodiversity perspective. The hills in the East support a significant number of breeding hen harriers; however, other native Upland breeding birds such as curlew and red grouse have suffered severe declines in recent decades and as such are of high conservation concern. Strict control of access and recreational activity on vulnerable soils should be implemented to reduce soil erosion and subsequent carbon loss. Curlew and hen harriers are recognised as an internationally important species, while (within the EU) upland heather moorland is designated
Policy and Guidance Notes for the Conservation of the Historic Environment of the Isle of Man
3.3 PPS 1/01
Planning Circular 1/98 # THE ALTERATION AND REPLACEMENT OF WINDOWS The Department of Infrastructure Planning And Building Control Division Murray House Mount Havelock Douglas Isle of Man IM1 2SF July 1998 # THE ALTERATION AND REPLACEMENT OF WINDOWS ## INTRODUCTION 1. This Planning Circular sets down the Department's policies in respect of the alteration or replacement of windows. These policies vary according to the age, merit and location of the building. For ease of use, the Circular divides buildings into several categories, and sets out the policies and reasoning for each category. ## NEED FOR PLANNING APPROVAL 2. This Circular should be read in conjunction with the recent Permitted Development Order (S.D. 664/97). The effect of the Order is that, with certain exceptions, the installation of a window in an existing aperture in a building erected after 1920 does not require planning approval. The exceptions are - a) Where the building is a registered building or in a conservation area, or in an area in respect of which the Planning Committee has passed a resolution to the effect that planning approval is required for such work; or b) Where the work would be in breach of a condition imposed on the grant of planning approval. ## GENERAL REASONING 3. The appearance of any building is strongly influenced by the detailing of its windows. The character and integrity of a building are usually best preserved by the retention and repair of the original windows, or, if this is not possible, the installation of replacements which respond suitably to the original design. In this context, "original" means those windows which were installed in the building at the time of its construction. If you are in doubt as to whether the existing windows are the originals, the staff in the Office of Planning may be able to give advice. ## BUILDING CATEGORIES 4. For the purposes of this Circular, buildings have been divided into the following categories:- a) Registered Buildings b) Buildings in Conservation Areas c) Buildings erected before 1921 and not falling within a) or b) which have largely retained their original character d) Other buildings erected before 1921 e) Buildings constructed after 1920 which do not fall into category a) or b) and which are not subject to previous planning conditions restricting the installation of replacement windows. Subsequent paragraphs of this Circular deal with each category in turn. ## Category a) REGISTERED BUILDINGS 5. Policy If the original windows are still in place they should preferably be repaired. If repair is impracticable, replacement windows MUST BE THE SAME as the originals in all respects, including the method of opening, materials and detailed design. This policy will be strictly applied other than where the particular circumstances are so exceptional as to justify a relaxation. Reasons for Policy: Registered Buildings are those buildings which are judged to be of special architectural or historic interest and which are already entered into the Protected Buildings register. Because of their special status, these buildings merit particular care and any work carried out by way of repair or alteration requires Registered Building Consent. Planning Approval and Registered Building Consent ARE ALWAYS required. Category b) BUILDINGS IN CONSERVATION AREAS 6. Policy If the original windows are in place they should preferably be repaired. If repair is impracticable, replacement windows which would be readily visible from a public thoroughfare MUST HAVE THE SAME method of opening as the originals. Whatever the material used in their construction, the windows MUST HAVE THE SAME pattern and section of glazing bars and the same frame sections as the original windows. Windows not readily visible from a public thoroughfare must have the same or similar pattern of glazing bars as the originals, but not necessarily the original method of opening, whatever the material used in the construction. Reasons for Policy: The Department has a duty to determine which parts of the Island are areas of special architectural or historic interest, the character of which it is desirable to preserve or enhance, and shall by order designate such areas as Conservation Areas. Planning Approval is required for all external works to properties in Conservation Areas to ensure that any proposals are in keeping with not only the individual building, but the special character and quality of the area as a whole. Planning Approval IS REQUIRED for alteration or replacement of window in the category of buildings. Category c) BUILDINGS ERECTED BEFORE 1921 AND NOT FALLING WITHIN CATEGORIES a) OR b) WHICH HAVE LARGELY RETAINED THEIR ORIGINAL CHARACTER 7. For ease of use, this category has been divided into two, based on the location of the building: i) Buildings in an Urban Setting Policy In the individual building, or group of buildings, whose principal elevations are readily visible from a public thoroughfare, if the original windows are in place, it may be possible to repair and renovate them. This can take place without permission, and will be encouraged by the Department. If repair is impracticable, or existing windows are not the originals, the preference will be for replacement windows in the said principal elevations to have the same method of opening as the originals. Whatever the materials used in their construction, the windows MUST HAVE the same or similar pattern and section of glazing bars and the same or similar frame sections as the original windows. Windows are not part of the principal elevations and which are not readily visible from a public thoroughfare should preferably have the same or similar pattern of glazing bars as the originals, but not necessarily the original method of opening, whatever the material used in their construction. Reasons for Policy: In many of our towns there are individual and groups of buildings which, although not worthy of Registration and not located in Conservation Areas, make a most important contribution to the local townscape; e.g. prominent corner sites or terraces. Where these buildings remain substantially unaltered, the aim is to encourage their enhancement in response to the original architectural concept. Planning Approval IS REQUIRED for alterations or replacement windows in this category of buildings. ii) Buildings in a rural setting Policy In an individual building, or group of buildings, whose principal elevations are readily visible from a public thoroughfare, if the original windows are in place, it may be possible to repair and renovate them. This can take place without permission, and will be encouraged by the Department. If repair is impracticable or the existing windows are not the originals, the preference will be for replacement windows on the said principal elevations, to have the same method of opening as the originals. Whatever the material used in their construction, the windows MUST HAVE the same or similar pattern and section of glazing bars and the same or similar frame sections as the original windows. Windows not part of the principal elevations and which are not readily visible from a public thoroughfare should preferable have the same or similar pattern of glazing bars as the originals, but not necessarily the original method of opening, whatever the material use in their construction. Reasons for Policy: The Island is fortunate in that it still retains a considerable number of unspoilt traditional vernacular buildings which epitomise the quality of the rural landscape. These buildings may not be worthy of Registration, and may not be located in Conservation Areas, but they do make a most important contribution to the traditional character of the rural landscape. Where these buildings remain substantially unaltered, the aim is to encourage their enhancement whilst preserving the original vernacular style. Planning Approval IS REQUIRED for alteration or replacement of windows in this category of buildings. Category d) OTHER BUILDINGS ERECTED BEFORE 1921 8. Policy Replacement windows should preferably be the same or as similar to the originals in the pattern of the glazing bars. However, provided that the glazing pattern is retained, a more relaxed approach will be taken to the replacement of windows in such properties. Reasons for Policy: Many buildings fall within this category and although there is little in the way of restriction, the aim is to encourage simulation of the original glazing pattern and this will apply particularly to buildings which are part of a larger group, such as a terrace, where replacement windows, if carefully designed, may serve to enhance the overall appearance of the group. Planning Approval IS REQUIRED for alteration or replacement of windows in this category of buildings. Category e) BUILDINGS CONSTRUCTED AFTER 1920 WHICH DO NOT FALL INTO CATEGORIES a) OR b) AND WHICH ARE NOT SUBJECT TO PREVIOUS PLANNING CONDITIONS RESTRICTING THE INSTALLATION OF REPLACEMENT WINDOWS. 9. The installation of replacement windows in these buildings does not require planning approval. The Department nevertheless recommends that the design of such windows should respect the architectural style of the building. ## FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE 10. Attention is drawn to the fact that the repair of existing windows or the installation of replacement windows may qualify for grant assistance under Financial Assistance Schemes which the Department operates. Further information regarding the availability of Grant Assistance is obtainable from the Finance Section of the Department. ## REVOCATION AND STATUS 11. Planning Circular 2/93 (Replacing External Doors and Windows) is herby withdrawn. 12. This Circular is issued by the Department in accordance with Article 11 (2)(a)(vi) of the Isle of Man Planning Scheme (Development Plan) Order 1982. 13. Further advice or information is available from: The Planning Office Department of Infrastructure 1st Floor Murray House Mount Havelock Douglas Isle of Man .
Low Density Housing in Parkland
the application complies with Planning Circular 8/89
permitted the removal of an external staircase, various structural repair works and extensive internal repair and restoration works
permitted the removal of an external staircase, various structural repair works and extensive internal repair and restoration works
approved the restorations to the tower crenelations
approved the installation of replacement windows
permitted further alterations internally, alterations to external openings and the installation of a dormer
permitted further alterations internally, alterations to external openings and the installation of a dormer
permitted ground level alterations and drainage
permitted the replacement of a modern garage on the building's south elevation with a single storey flat roof garage with a parapet wall
permitted the replacement of a modern garage on the building's south elevation with a single storey flat roof garage with a parapet wall
permitted the installation of two boreholes, one in the vicinity of the modern garage building