Loading document...
Application No.: 25/91177/B Applicant: Mrs Pauline Smith Proposal: Erection of single storey extension and removal of door to east elevation Site Address: 7 River Walk Braddan Douglas Isle Of Man IM4 4TJ Principal Planner: Chris Balmer Expected Decision Level: Officer Delegation Recommended Decision: Permitted Date of Recommendation: 25.02.2026 _________________________________________________________________
C : Conditions for approval N : Notes attached to conditions
C 1. The development hereby approved shall be begun before the expiration of four years from the date of this decision notice.
Reason: To comply with Article 26 of the Town and Country Planning (Development Procedure) Order 2019 and to avoid the accumulation of unimplemented planning approvals.
This application has been recommended for approval for the following reason.
Overall, the extension and door would have no significant impacts to residential amenities nor public amenities to warrant a refusal. It is considered the proposal would comply with the relevant policies of the Isle Of Man Strategic Plan 2016 and the Residential Design Guide 2021.
Plans/Drawings/Information; This approval relates to the submitted documents and drawing all received on 16.01.2026.
_______________________________________________________________ Right to Appeal None
1.0 THE APPLICATION SITE - 1.1 The application site is the residential curtilage of 7 River Walk, Braddan, Douglas, a single storey detached dwelling located on the eastern side of River Walk and to the west of Braddan Primary School. The dwelling sits within a housing estate of similar style/types of properties. The site sits below the ground level of the adjacent highway Braddan Road which runs along the rear boundary of the site.
2.0 PLANNING POLICIES - 2.1 The application site is located within an area identified as being Predominantly Residential on the Area Plan for the East and the site is not within a Conservation Area. The site is not within a flood risks area. As such, the following parts of the Strategic Plan are relevant: - 2.2 General Policy 2 of the Strategic Plan is considered applicable, which states: "Development which is in accordance with the land-use zoning and proposals in the appropriate Area Plan and with other policies of this Strategic Plan will normally be permitted, provided that the development:
3.1 The previous planning applications associated with the site are considered relevant in the assessment and determination of this application; - 3.2 Alterations, erection of replacement conservatory roof and erection of a front porch 22/00200/B - APPROVED
4.1 Planning approval is sought for the Erection of single storey extension and removal of door to east elevation. The rear extension would have a depth of 4.2metres, a width of 7metres and a maximum height of 4.3metres. The external finishes are proposed to match the existing dwelling.
5.1 None at the time of writing. 6.0 ASSESSMENT
6.1 The key issues relate to the potential visual impact upon the street scene and potential impact upon neighbouring amenities. Potential visual impact upon the street scene
6.2 The proposed extension in terms of its design, proportion, position and finishes are in keeping with the existing property and would be an acceptable form of development. - 6.3 Within the street scene, being to the rear the works would not be especially publicly apparent, with the ground level of the site being located below that of the Braddan Road ground level. However, notwithstanding this give there are no concerns with the design approach or the scale of the development. Accordingly, from these respects the proposals would comply with General Policy 2 and the Residential Design Guide 2021. Potential impact upon neighbouring amenities - 6.4 The properties most likely to be affected by the works are Nrs 5 and 9 River Walk which are to either side of the application site. However, given the design, scale, height, boundary treatments and distances to these properties, it is not considered the potential impacts would be so significant to warrant a refusal.
7.1 Overall, the extension and door would have no significant impacts to residential amenities nor public amenities to warrant a refusal. It is considered the proposal would comply with the relevant policies of the Isle Of Man Strategic Plan 2016 and the Residential Design Guide 2021 and therefore it is recommended that the application be approved. - 8.0 RIGHT TO APPEAL AND RIGHT TO GIVE EVIDENCE
8.1 The Town and Country Planning (Development Procedure) Order 2019 sets out the process for determining planning applications (including appeals). It sets out a Right to Appeal (i.e. to submit an appeal against a planning decision) and a Right to Give Evidence at Appeals (i.e. to participate in an appeal if one is submitted).
8.2 Article A10 sets out that the right to appeal is available to:
that submit a relevant objection; and o any other person who has made an objection that meets specified criteria.
8.3 Article 8(2)(a) requires that in determining an application, the Department must decide who has a right to appeal, in accordance with the criteria set out in article A10. - 8.4 The Order automatically affords the Right to Give Evidence to the following (no determination is required):
8.5 The Department of Environment Food and Agriculture is responsible for the determination of planning applications. As a result, where officers within the Department make comments in a professional capacity they cannot be given the Right to Appeal.
I can confirm that this decision has been made by a Principal Planner in accordance with the authority afforded to that Officer by the appropriate DEFA Delegation and that in making this decision the Officer has agreed the recommendation in relation to who should be afforded interested person status and/or rights to appeal.
Decision Made : Permitted Date: 25.02.2026 Determining Officer Signed : J SINGLETON Jason Singleton Principal Planner
Customer note This copy of the officer report reflects the content of the office copy and has been produced in this form for the benefit of our online service/customers and archive record.
Copyright in submitted documents remains with their authors. Request removal