Loading document...
Application No.: 25/91131/C Applicant: Mr Philip Jolley Proposal: Additional use of existing general industrial and storage and distribution unit for light industrial purposes and the installation of trade counter Site Address: Unit 73 Balthane Park Balthane Ballasalla Isle Of Man IM9 2AX Planning Officer: Lucy Kinrade Photo Taken: 15.01.2026 Site Visit: 15.01.2026 Expected Decision Level: Officer Delegation Recommended Decision: Permitted Date of Recommendation: 03.02.2026 _________________________________________________________________
C : Conditions for approval N : Notes attached to conditions
Reason: To comply with Article 26 of the Town and Country Planning (Development Procedure) Order 2019 and to avoid the accumulation of unimplemented planning approvals.
Reason: The Department has assessed the impact of the proposal on the basis of the specific use and any alternative uses within the same Use Class will require further consideration.
Reason: The application has been assessed on the basis for additional light industrial purposes only. Retail and tasting were specially omitted from the application and so any proposal for such would require separate planning application as assessed accordingly.
restricted to the location as shown marked (H) and the entrance hall limited to the area marked (C) on the same plan and retained as such thereafter.
Reason: The application has been assessed on this basis only and with the trade counter being ancillary to the primary storage, distribution and light industrial microbrewing use of the unit.
Reason: for the avoidance of doubt aligning with the original approval of the units, and in the interest of highway safety.
The proposal is considered to comply with the provisions of Strategic Policies 1 and 7, General Policy 2 and Business Policy 5. The three space parking provision is considered acceptable to meet the low expected demand for the small-scale operation and sufficient to cope with any infrequent trade callers in line with General Policy 2 (h and i), Paragraph 9.2.7, Transport Policies 4 and 7, and Appendix 7. There is no adverse harm expected on amenity of adjacent users or any neighbouring dwellings given the small-scale operation, containment within the buildings and noting the distance from nearest residential property so as to not undermine General Policy 2 (b, c, and g) or Environment Policy 22 of the IOM Strategic Plan 2016.
Plans/Drawings/Information; This approval relates to the following:
_________________________________________________________________ Right to Appeal
It is recommended that the following organisations should NOT be given the Right to Appeal:
1.1 The application site relates to an existing end unit within the recently built industrial units located within Balthane Park, Ballasalla. The unit was originally approved as a group of 20 within two blocks under PA 21/00746/B. This application was approved subject to a number of conditions including for their approved use for general industrial and storage and distribution use only. More details are contained at 3.0 of this report. - 1.2 Unit 73 is situated at the end of the block with its gable facing over the main access road. The unit has an existing roller shutter door on its front elevation, and its external elevations are rendered masonry to the base and grey sheet cladding above. Opposite the units are a number of vehicle parking spaces. THE PROPOSAL
2.1 Approval is sought for the additional use of the unit for light industrial purposes (Use Class 2.2), and the installation of a trade counter. - 2.2 Supporting information provided by the applicant indicates that the proposal is to allow for the making of a product within the unit (micro-brewing), and the installation of a trade counter to facilitate trade customers approx. 2-3 times per month. There are to be no services available to any visiting members of the public and no public retail sales. - 2.3 There are no external works proposed. - 2.4 Floor plans indicate that the ground floor would be laid out to provide:
2.5 Site plan information indicated that the proposal is to be served by 3 No. dedicated parking spaces. PLANNING HISTORY
3.1 The unit was approved as part of 21/00746/B subject to conditions; 1) 4 year time period, 2) no mezzanines, 3) use for General industrial (Class 2.3) and/or Storage/distribution (Class 2.4) and for no other purpose at any time, 4) not occupied until pedestrian and vehicle arrangements were provided, 5) cycle storage provided, 6) soft landscaping submitted, and 7) bird and bat box detailed provided. Conditions 5,6,7 were prior to conditions which have been satisfied. The reason for conditions 2 and 3 were based on the limited car parking available for the site and so preventing any increased floor area or alternative uses requiring increased parking demand (appendix 7 IOM Strategic Plan 2016). - 3.2 Since the original approval, further approval has been granted for changes to the area of car parking opposite unit's 73-77. PA 24/91171/B was approved for parking reconfiguration to create 8 additional car parking spaces, including manoeuvring and hardstanding. This was approved 19 Nov 2024 and included a condition for drainage details to be provided before works start. No condition information has been provided and during the site visit parking on site didn't appear to align with those details approved. DEVELOPMENT PLAN POLICIES
4.1 The site lies within an area designated on the Area Plan for the South 2013 as 'Industrial'. The site is not recognised as being at any flood risk although there is some surface water risk in the surrounding area and along the adjacent Silverburn river. There are no trees on the site and the area is not a Conservation Area.
4.2 Relevant policies of Area Plan/Local Plan
4.3 Relevant policies of IOM Strategic Plan 2016.
4.4 Reference any relevant PPS or NPD
5.1 Legislation o None - 5.2 Policy/Strategy/Guidance o Manual for Manx Roads (last updated June 2021)- Sections on parking standards and access
REPRESENTATIONS Copies of representations received can be viewed on the Government's website. This report contains summaries only.
6.1 Malew Commissioners - no objection (07/01/2026).
6.2 Department of Infrastructure - no objection (28/01/2025) - revised proposals appear less intensive than previously submitted and the parking demand for the trade counter will be low. Subsequently, do not oppose the application. - 6.3 Fire and Rescue Service - comments (16/01/2026) - the applicant must consult with fire department prior to commencement as the premises falls within part of their Fire Precautions Act. - 6.4 The following were also consulted but no response received at the time of writing the report 03/02/2026:
7.1 The application seeks additional light industrial use to an existing unit approved for use only as General industrial (Class 2.3) and/or Storage/distribution (Class 2.4). The key matters in the assessment of this application are principle, nature of operation including trade counter, highway safety impact and whether there are any other issues.
facility will be almost 50/50 split with half the unit used for making the produce (microbrewing) and the other half for storage and distribution. There will be a small area for staff facilities and WC, and also a small entrance area where there is access to a small trade counter. The trade counter is to be for trade customers only and indicated to be on average 2-
7.4.1 With the retail and tasting elements now omitted as confirmed in 6.3 above, the proposal requires to provide parking relevant to the proposed additional light industrial use. The IOM Strategic Plan 2016 sets out minimum standards for light industrial use and the size of this unit requiring at least 3 spaces, and submitted plans indicate 3 spaces allocated for this unit. The proposal is considered acceptable numerically, and conditions will be added to ensure those three spaces remain available for use by the unit at all times.
7.5 Any other matters
8.1 The proposal is considered to comply with the provisions of Strategic Policies 1 and 7, General Policy 2 and Business Policy 5. The three space parking provision is considered acceptable to meet the low expected demand for the small-scale operation and sufficient to cope with any infrequent trade callers in line with General Policy 2 (h and i), Paragraph 9.2.7, Transport Policies 4 and 7, and Appendix 7. There is no adverse harm expected on amenity of adjacent users or any neighbouring dwellings given the small-scale operation, containment within the buildings and noting the distance from nearest residential property so as to not undermine General Policy 2 (b, c, and g) or Environment Policy 22 of the IOM Strategic Plan 2016. - 9.0 RIGHT TO APPEAL AND RIGHT TO GIVE EVIDENCE
9.1 The Town and Country Planning (Development Procedure) Order 2019 sets out the process for determining planning applications (including appeals). It sets out a Right to Appeal
9.3 Article 8(2)(a) requires that in determining an application, the Department must decide who has a right to appeal, in accordance with the criteria set out in article A10. - 9.4 The Order automatically affords the Right to Give Evidence to the following (no determination is required):
9.5 The Department of Environment Food and Agriculture is responsible for the determination of planning applications. As a result, where officers within the Department make comments in a professional capacity they cannot be given the Right to Appeal.
I can confirm that this decision has been made by the Head of Development Management in accordance with the authority afforded to that Officer by the appropriate DEFA Delegation and that in making this decision the Officer has agreed the recommendation in relation to who should be afforded interested person status, and/or rights to appeal.
Decision Made : Permitted Date : 05.02.2026 Determining Officer
Signed : S BUTLER Stephen Butler Head of Development Management
Customer note This copy of the officer report reflects the content of the office copy and has been produced in this form for the benefit of our online service/ customers and archive record.
Copyright in submitted documents remains with their authors. Request removal