28 consultees were identified: Coonceil Valley Corpagh Doolish, DEFA Biodiversity, DEFA Ecosystem Policy Team, and 25 more consultees.
DEFA Biodiversity
Statutory
ConditionsShould this application be approved, we request that a condition is secured for an ecological mitigation plan to be submitted to Planning for written approval prior to any works
Concerns: Douglas Fir Trees planting, south facing bird boxes to bat boxes
Conditions requested: Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP), ecological mitigation plan to be submitted, sensitive low level lighting plan
DEFA Forestry withdrew its objection following submission of amended plans and additional arboricultural information, noting trees are proposed to be retained and protected and sufficient information was provided, but it requested a precommencement condition for technical specifications for tree protection fencing/signage and a condition to ensure tree protection measures are implemented throughout the development.
I would therefore request that this information is sought through a precommencement condition, and that a condition is in place to ensure these tree protection measures are implemented throughout the entire development process.
Conditions requested: Condition ensuring tree protection measures are implemented throughout the entire development process., Precommencement condition seeking the technical specifications for fencing and signage erected around the construction exclusion zone.
Department for Environment Food and Agriculture Forestry
Statutory
No ObjectionForestry Officer withdraws objection following amended plans. All trees except one category U sycamore are retained. Requests condition for technical specifications of tree protection fencing and signage.
I would like to withdraw my objection to this planning application for the following reasons
Conditions requested: Condition to ensure tree protection measures implemented throughout development, Technical specifications for tree protection fencing and signage to be submitted as pre-commencement condition
Department of Environment, Food & Agriculture (DEFA)
Statutory
NeutralRequested completion of a development-within-9-metres-of-a-watercourse form so Fisheries can further assess the application and may arrange a site visit if needed.
Good afternoon John, This planning application indicates that the proposed works in are in close proximity to a watercourse. To further assess this application and the potential impact to the nearby watercourse, you are requested to complete the attached ‘Development within 9 Metres of a Watercourse’ form.
Concerns: Potential impact to the nearby watercourse, Proposed works are in close proximity to a watercourse
Department of Environment, Food & Agriculture (DEFA) Fisheries
Statutory
No ObjectionDEFA Fisheries officers have no objection to the amended application, noting the changes do not affect the oil separator which provides protection to the nearby watercourse.
Please note that DEFA Fisheries officers have viewed the amendments made to the planning application 22/00865/B, Millmount Complex, New Castletown Road, Douglas and have no objection to this as the changes do not affect and still include an oil separator which provides a level of protection to the nearby watercourse.
Department of Infrastructure (DOI) Flood Risk Management Division
Statutory
ConditionsThe Department is satisfied with the flood risk assessment and advises that the new units should be conditioned to have a finished flood level of 12.5m AOD2.
We are happy with the finding in the flood risk assessment provided and that it is conditioned that the new units have a finished flood level of 12.5mAD02.
Manx Wildlife Trust
Public
NeutralThe Manx Wildlife Trust’s Preliminary Ecological Appraisal is confirmed as being all in order, but the Department still requires additional details and amendments to mitigation implementation.
The Ecosystem Policy Team can confirm that the Manx Wildlife Trust’s Preliminary Ecological Appraisal dated November is all in order.
Concerns: Despite the appraisal being in order, further details are required on implementation of mitigation measures to ensure no net loss of biodiversity
Department of Environment, Food & Agriculture (DEFA) Ecosystem Policy Team
Statutory
ObjectDEFA’s Ecosystem Policy Team objects due to insufficient ecological/biodiversity consideration and requests ecological surveys and mitigation details prior to determination, including a Preliminary Ecological Appraisal and further surveys/mitigation where protected species may be impacted.
We object on the following grounds:
Concerns: Japanese knotweed presence and risk of spread due to works, Lack of ecological consideration and insufficient biodiversity/ecological information prior to determination, Loss of semi-natural habitat (trees and shrubs) and absence of arboricultural impact assessment, tree removal/protection plans, and landscaping plan showing retention and compensatory planting, Negative impacts on nesting birds, insects, and commuting/feeding (and possibly roosting) bats; absence of ecological mitigation proposals for no net loss, Potential for roosting bats and nesting birds in the warehouse scheduled for demolition; need for thorough checks and appropriate measures, Proximity to River Dhoo corridor/Wildlife Site and risk of pollution/damage during construction, including light pollution from site lighting
Department of Infrastructure
Statutory
ConditionsDo not oppose subject to a condition requiring the new units to have a finished flood level of 12.5mAD02.
Flood Risk Management Representational History for this case: IN response to the newly submitted plans Conditions We are happy with the finding in the flood risk assessment provided and that it is conditioned that the new units have a finished flood level of 12.5mAD02.
Department of Infrastructure (DOI)
Statutory
ConditionsFlood Risk Management deferred its input pending a full Flood Risk Assessment and further mitigation details.
DEFFER – pending a full Flood Risk Assessment
Concerns: An in depth Flood Risk Assessment and mitigations are required before Flood Risk Management can comment further., The proposed building area and lands adjacent to the curtilage are subject to flooding.
The Council indicates there are no major concerns with the amendments to the development and that it continues to support it.
there does not appear to be any major concerns with the amendments that would warrant the Council withdrawing its support of the development
Highway Development Control
Internal
UnknownHighways DC advised that the submission is inadequate and that further information is required (accessibility audit, transport statement, and road safety assessment) to demonstrate no detriment to highway function and road safety.
Highways Development Control requires to conform to information requirements described in Manual for Manx Roads and the submission is inadequate to demonstrate that the proposed development will not be detrimental to the satisfactory functioning of the highway and road safety.
Concerns: Requires an accessibility audit, transport statement, and road safety assessment., Submission is inadequate to demonstrate the proposed development will not be detrimental to the satisfactory functioning of the highway and road safety.
Coonceil Valley Corpagh Doolish
Internal
ObjectThe Environmental Services Committee resolved to object to the application unless issues including Japanese Knotweed risk, environmental policy compliance, and required supporting environmental information are addressed.
the Committee has resolved to object to the application
Concerns: Failure to comply with Environment Policy 24 requirements for Environmental Impact Assessment/supporting environmental information, Insufficient information to address mitigation for loss of wildlife habitat and tress, Japanese Knotweed spread risk not demonstrated; no details/risk assessment or methodology provided to reduce the risk
Douglas City Council
Statutory
ObjectThe Environmental Services Committee resolved to object to the application unless specified environmental matters (Japanese Knotweed, compliance with environment policy requirements, and environmental information) are addressed.
Re: PA 22/00865/B – Demolition of existing warehouse and erection of 18 light industrial units with associated road infrastructure, parking and amendment to site levels and ground infill at Millmount Complex, New Castletown Road, Douglas Isle of Man Following consideration of the above planning application at a meeting of the Council’s Environmental Services Committee held on the 22/09/22 I can advise that the Committee has resolved to object to the application.
Concerns: Development on/close to contaminated land: risk from spread of Japanese Knotweed not demonstrated, Failure to comply with Environment Policy 24 regarding likely significant effect on the environment and provision of required environmental information, Insufficient information provided to address requested environmental matters, No details/risk assessment or methodology provided to reduce Japanese Knotweed spread
Department for Environment Food and Agriculture Fisheries
Statutory
No ObjectionFisheries has no objections provided there is no adverse effect on adjacent watercourse. Precautions needed to prevent harmful materials entering river. Recommends waste material interceptor and soakaway meet required capacity and tenants receive best practice advice on hazardous material disposal.
I can confirm that DEFA, fisheries have no objections to this development from a fisheries perspective, provided that there is no adverse effect on the adjacent watercourse.
Concerns: Precautions needed to reduce possibility of harmful materials such as concrete or washings entering the river, Proposed waste material interceptor and soakaway must meet required capacity to avoid contaminated surface water entering watercourse
Isle of Man Government - Manx Utilities
Statutory
ConditionsRequested percolation testing if a soakaway adjacent to the river is proposed, and advised confirming any private private SW drainage connections/layout if soakaway is not used as expected.
Further to the above planning application I am just confirming that as you are proposing to use a soakaway adjacent to the river, which may possibly work you will need to provide percolation test to demonstrate that this will work before we can support the application.
Concerns: Existing drainage/soakaway performance is uncertain for a soakaway adjacent to the river.
Conditions requested: Provide percolation test to demonstrate that a soakaway adjacent to the river will work before support can be given., Trace the private SW drainage on the development (including MHs highlighted) and carry out any necessary investigations (e.g., via a contractor such as Clear Drains).
Isle of Man Utilities
Internal
ConditionsAdvised that if a soakaway adjacent to the river is proposed, percolation tests must be provided; alternatively, trace private SW drainage (MHs) and undertake the necessary investigations.
Further to the above planning application I am just confirming that as you are proposing to use a soakaway adjacent to the river, which may possibly work you will need to provide percolation test to demonstrate that this will work before we can support the application.
Concerns: Need to demonstrate that a soakaway adjacent to the river will work., Private SW drainage layout is not fully established; investigations/tracing of private drainage (MHs) are needed.
Conditions requested: Provide percolation test to demonstrate that a soakaway adjacent to the river will work before support can be provided.
Department for Enterprise
Statutory
No ObjectionThe Department for Enterprise provided comment and support, noting the proposals appear to accord with industrial land designation, align with redevelopment and brownfield objectives, and concluded it wishes to provide support for the proposals.
In conclusion, and having considered the scheme within the context of the Island Plan, the Economic Strategy, the Department's Plan and Isle of Man Climate Change Plan, I wish to provide my support for these proposals
Head of Business Isle of Man
Internal
No ObjectionProvides support for the proposals, noting they accord with industrial land designation, support brownfield redevelopment and start-up opportunities, and align with Climate Change and sustainability objectives.
In conclusion, and having considered the scheme within the context of the Island Plan, the Economic Strategy, the Department's Plan and Isle of Man Climate Change Plan, I wish to provide my support for these proposals
Highways Drainage
Statutory
ConditionsHighways Drainage advised that allowing surface water runoff onto a public highway would contravene highway requirements and requested the applicant provide details of measures to prevent surface water from flowing onto the highway.
The applicant is to provide details of measures to prevent surface water from flowing onto the highway.
Conditions requested: Applicant to provide details of measures to prevent surface water from flowing onto the highway.
Highways Development Control
Statutory
ConditionsHighways Development Control noted revised amendments reduced the number of units and adjusted parking, and stated the changes remain acceptable in highway terms and it continues to not oppose the proposal subject to conditions.
HDC continues to not oppose this proposal subject to conditions for:
Conditions requested: Access and site layout to accord with the named Drawing: Proposed Transport Plan; No: JTM2170-P-08 Rev B., Construction Management Plan.
Manx National Heritage
Statutory
No ObjectionHaving read through the environmental amendments made to this application we have no additional concerns to address.
Ecosystem Policy Team
Statutory
ConditionsEcosystem Policy Team withdraws objection due to reduced tree impact and added mitigation, requests conditions for ecological mitigation plan, CEMP, and lighting plan.
The Ecosystem Policy Team no longer object to this application on the basis that the impact upon existing trees has been much lessened and an appropriate level of ecological mitigation has now been incorporated into the plans.
Concerns: inclusion of 16 Douglas Fir Trees - suggest mixture of species including native broadleaved, some south facing bird boxes changed to bat boxes
Conditions requested: Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP) to be provided to Planning and approved in writing prior to works, ecological mitigation plan to be submitted to Planning for written approval prior to any works, sensitive low level lighting plan to be submitted to Planning and approved in writing prior to permanent lighting installation
Douglas Borough Council
Statutory
No ObjectionThe Council previously considered the application and there do not appear to be any major concerns with the amendments that would warrant withdrawing support of the development.
there does not appear to be any major concerns with the amendments that would warrant the Council withdrawing its support of the development.
DEFA Ecosystem Policy Team
Statutory
ConditionsThe Ecosystem Policy Team was content with changes to the number and location of bird boxes but raised questions about the inclusion of certain Douglas Fir trees, requested bat boxes for some south-facing bird boxes, and requested conditions for submission/approval of an ecological mitigation plan, a Construction Environmental Management Plan, and controls on permanent lighting unless a sensitive low-level lighting plan is provided and approved in writing.
retaining an existing warehouse. These changes would remain acceptable in highway terms. Accordingly, HDC continues to not oppose this proposal subject to conditions for: - a) Access and site layout to accord with the named Drawing: Proposed Transport Plan; No: JTM2170-P-08 Rev C. - b) Construction Management Plan. The Applicant is advised of the need for a s109(A) Highway Agreement for works to the access junction. (15.08.23) 5.3 DEFA Biodiversity - The Ecosystem Policy Team acknowledge the changes to the proposed number and location of bird boxes as a result of the removal of one of the buildings from the proposed plans. From 19 boxes to 15. We are content with this change. Our comments from our response dated 8th March 2023 are still relevant:
Concerns: Douglas Fir Trees may grow too large for site; suggest native broadleaved species, some south facing bird boxes should be changed to bat boxes
Conditions requested: Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP) to be submitted and approved prior to works, including measures for knotweed, river protection, tree protection, bats, and nesting birds, ecological mitigation plan to be submitted and approved prior to works, including details of bird boxes, bat boxes, ground flora, and tree planting, sensitive low level lighting plan submitted and approved prior to installation, following Bat Conservation Trust guidance
Department for Environment Food and Agriculture Biodiversity
Statutory
ConditionsDEFA Biodiversity acknowledges reduction in bird boxes from 19 to 15 and is content. Requests conditions for detailed ecological mitigation plan, construction environmental management plan, and sensitive lighting plan prior to works commencing.
We are content with this change. Our comments from our response dated 8th March 2023 are still relevant
Concerns: Inclusion of 16 Douglas Fir Trees should be reconsidered; mixture of species including native broadleaved species preferred, Lighting has potential to lessen value of ecological mitigation measures, Some south-facing bird boxes should be changed to bat boxes
Conditions requested: Construction Environmental Management Plan with measures for Japanese knotweed eradication, river protection, tree protection, bat protection, and nesting bird avoidance, Detailed ecological mitigation plan including nesting bird boxes, bat boxes, shade tolerant ground flora, and tree planting details, Sensitive low level lighting plan following Bat Conservation Trust and Institute of Lighting Professionals Guidance Note 8
DOI, Highways Development Control
Statutory
ConditionsNotes amendments with reduced units and increased parking; continues not to oppose subject to conditions on access/site layout and Construction Management Plan.
Accordingly, HDC continues to not oppose this proposal subject to conditions for: - a) Access and site layout to accord with the named Drawing: Proposed Transport Plan; No: JTM2170-P-08 Rev C. - b) Construction Management Plan.
Conditions requested: Access and site layout to accord with the named Drawing: Proposed Transport Plan; No: JTM2170-P-08 Rev C., Construction Management Plan. The Applicant is advised of the need for a s109(A) Highway Agreement for works to the access junction.
Highways Services
Statutory
ConditionsHighways Services accepts the proposal subject to conditions regarding site access modifications, layout compliance, and a Construction Management Plan. The applicant is advised of the need for a s109(A) Highway Agreement for works to the access junction.
As amended the proposal is acceptable in highway terms for no opposition to be raised subject to conditions
Conditions requested: Access and site layout to accord with the named Drawing: Proposed Transport Plan; No: JTM2170-P-08 Rev C., Construction Management Plan., The Applicant is advised of the need for a s109(A) Highway Agreement for works to the access junction.
No objection subject to conditions regarding protection of public sewer, cross-section drawing for soakaways, and discussions for adoption of foul drainage.
Manx Utilities Authority has assessed the above planning application and would like to advise you that the Authority has no objection to the application subject to the following condition/s:-
Conditions requested: If the applicant wished for the foul drainage do be adopted, discussion with MU should take place post planning and before construction., Prior to any works commencing MU also would like to have a cross section drawing through the proposed soakaway units in relation to the combined sewer., Public sewerage crosses this site. The line of the sewer(s) must be identified before development work commences. The sewer(s) must be fully protected whilst all building works are being carried out. No part of the proposed development may be constructed, nor any trees planted within three metres of any public sewer either at the time of construction or any time in the future.
Manx Utilities Authority
Statutory
ConditionsManx Utilities Authority assessed the application and advised no objection subject to multiple conditions relating to protection of public sewer(s), provision of drawings and cross-sections for soakaways, protection and separation of sewer/drainage works, and drainage connections and compliance requirements.
Manx Utilities Authority has assessed the above planning application and would like to advise you that the Authority has no objection to the application subject to the following condition/s:-
Concerns: Drainage works must conform to Manx Utilities’ adoption standards and may require CCTV surveys., Public sewerage crosses the site and must be identified, protected and safeguarded., Surface water must not discharge to foul drainage systems.
Conditions requested: 9 communication fees will be payable to Manx Utilities Authority in respect each property being connected (directly or indirectly) to the public drainage system., All drainage works must conform to the requirements of “Manx Sewers for Adoption”., Any necessary CCTV surveys are to be carried out at the developer’s expense., If the applicant wished for the foul drainage do be adopted, discussion with MU should take place post planning and before construction., No part of the proposed development may be constructed, nor any trees planted within three metres of any public sewer either at the time of construction or any time in the future., Prior to any works commencing MU also would like to have a cross section drawing through the proposed soakaway units in relation to the combined sewer., The line of the public sewer(s) must be identified before development work commences., The proposed dwelling must be connected to the public sewer(s) in a manner acceptable to Manx Utilities., The sewer(s) must be fully protected whilst all building works are being carried out., There must be NO discharge of surface water (directly or indirectly) from this proposed development to any foul drainage system(s).
Department of Infrastructure Flood Risk Management Division
Statutory
No ObjectionFlood Risk Management accepts the flood risk assessment findings and is happy with the proposal conditioned on finished flood level of 12.5mAD02 for new units.
We are happy with the finding in the flood risk assessment provided and that it is conditioned that the new units have a finished flood level of 12.5mAD02.
Conditions requested: New units to have finished flood level of 12.5mAD02
Flood Risk Management
Statutory
ConditionsFlood Risk Management stated it is happy with the findings in the flood risk assessment, with the outcome that the new units should have a finished flood level of 12.5mAD02 as a condition.
and that it is conditioned that the new units have a finished flood level of 12.5mAD02.
Conditions requested: Finished flood level of 12.5mAD02 for the new units.
DEFA Fisheries confirmed no objections from a fisheries perspective provided there is no adverse effect on the adjacent watercourse; it requested precautions to reduce harmful materials entering the river and that the waste material interceptor and soakaway meet required capacity, and it recommended a welcome pack for new tenants regarding hazardous material disposal.
I can confirm that DEFA, fisheries have no objections to this development from a fisheries perspective, provided that there is no adverse effect on the adjacent watercourse.
DEFA Fisheries officers considered the amendments to the planning application and stated they have no objection because the changes do not affect the inclusion of an oil separator that provides protection to the nearby watercourse.
Good afternoon, Please note that DEFA Fisheries officers have viewed the amendments made to the planning application 22/00865/B, Millmount Complex, New Castletown Road, Douglas and have no objection to this as the changes do not affect and still include an oil separator which provides a level of protection to the nearby watercourse. With best wishes, Lesh my yeearreeyn share, John.
DEFA Fisheries officers viewed the amendments to 22/00865/B and had no objection because the changes do not affect the oil separator providing protection to the nearby watercourse.
have no objection to this as the changes do not affect and still include an oil separator which provides a level of protection to the nearby watercourse.
DEFA Fisheries officers reviewed amendments to the application and have no objection because the changes do not affect inclusion of an oil separator providing protection to a nearby watercourse.
DEFA Fisheries officers have viewed the amendments made to the planning application 22/00865/B, Millmount Complex, New Castletown Road, Douglas and have no objection
Department of Environment, Food & Agriculture
Statutory
No ObjectionDEFA Fisheries officers have viewed the amendments and have no objection as the changes do not affect the inclusion of an oil separator, which provides protection to the nearby watercourse.
have no objection to this as the changes do not affect and still include an oil separator which provides a level of protection to the nearby watercourse.