Officer Planning Report

Application No.: | | | :-- | :-- | | Applicant: | Mr J T Winn | | Proposal: | Erection of a conservatory on rear elevation | | Site Address: | Arbory Woodlands Avenue Douglas IM2 3QS | ### Considerations Case Officer : Brian Sinden Expected Decision Level: Delegated Decision ### Written Representations We have received no private representations for this application. ### Consultations Consultee : Highways Division Notes: no adverse traffic impacts Consultee : The Town Clerk Notes : Policy

Officer's Report

The site comprises the curtilage of a detached bungalow on Woodlands Avenue. Proposed is a conservatory at the rear:- 7.1 m wide deep.

No impact on public amenity. Perhaps some impact on "The Pines", but none which could not be mitigated by 2 m boundary fencing/walling. There is not in fact a South Western elevation, but the "perspective view" is reasonably clear.

Recommendation

Recommended Decision : Permitted

Date of Recommendation : 22.03.2004

Recommendation :

Conditions and Notes for Approval / Reasons and Notes for Refusal

C : Conditions for approval N : Notes attached to conditions R : Reasons for refusal

• : Notes attached to refusals

C 1. The development hereby permitted shall commence before the expiration of four years from the date of this notice.

C 2. This approval relates to the submitted documents which are date stamped 24th February 2004.

I confirm that this decision accords with Government Circular No 57/01 (Delegation of Functions to Director of Planning and Building Control).

Decision Made : Approval by delegation

Signed : .................................................. M. I. McCauley Director of Planning and Building Control

dcreprec.doc

Signed Date 22.3.04

Summary of objections/views No representations on file 22/3

General Report	Site Visited	YES/NO
1. The site comprises the curtilage of a detached bungalow on Woodlands Avenue.
2. Proposed is a conservatory at the rear: - 7.1m wide x 4.3m deep.
3. No impact on public amenity.
4. Perhaps some impact on "The Pines", but none which could not be mitigated by 2m boundary fencing/walling. There is not in fact a S.W. elevation, but the "perspective view" is reasonably clear.

Signed Date 22.3.04

Recommendations	Approve/Refuse