Loading document...
Application No.: 15/00211/B Applicant: Heritage Homes Limited Proposal: Erection of 16 dwellings (amendment to PA 13/00777/B) Site Address: Plot 71-73, 89-93, 101 & 102 Residential Estate Under Construction Land At Ballakilley Church Road Port Erin Isle of Man Case Officer : Miss S E Corlett Expected Decision Level: Planning Committee
THIS APPLICATION IS REFERRED TO THE PLANNING COMMITTEE DUE TO THE PLANNING HISTORY OF THE SITE AND AS THERE IS A REQUIREMENT FOR A LEGAL AGREEMENT TO SECURE AFFORDABLE HOUSING.
This application, along with PA5/00212/B were considered by the Planning Committee on 20th April, 2015 and 1st June, 2015 respectively and in both cases the Committee indicated that they would approve the application if there were in place legal Agreements to modify the existing Agreement, to require the provision of two further affordable units reflecting the fact that the two applications resulted in 7 additional dwellings which generates a requirement for there to be a further 1.75 affordable units provided in accordance with Housing Policy 5. The Planning Committee wished it to be noted that the affordable units resulting from this development should be provided on site rather than as a commuted sum as the type of housing being proposed here and elsewhere within this estate is suitable for first time buyers whereas there is limited opportunity for new affordable units elsewhere in the south.
Following discussions with the former Department of Social Care, now Department of Infrastructure Housing, the applicant is now seeking not to have to provide the additional two units (rounded up from 1.75). The reason for this is given below in the Assessment section.
1.1 The site is part of the area where 155 plots and associated dwellings and infrastructure were approved, constituting the now developing Ballakilley estate located on the north western side of Church Road on the outskirts of Port Erin but within the parish of Rushen. The area of the current application is at the north western side of the estate, abutting the Ponyfields housing estate which fronts onto Ballafesson Road. Immediately alongside the application site are 68 - 79, Magherbreekyn and 52, Magherchirrym, all two storey semidetached houses which back onto the application site. - 1.2 As approved the development incorporates 2 pairs of semi-detached houses and 6 detached dwellings, the detached dwellings taking four different forms including the large Oak type.
2.1 Proposed is the erection of sixteen dwellings - three pairs of semi detached dwellings and two terraces of five dwellings each. The terraces have frontages which step back three times within the terrace, the semi-detached dwellings are two different types. All of the dwellings have on-site parking with at least two spaces available to each. - 2.2 Some of the dwellings are slightly further from the existing dwellings to the rear than were those previously approved and some, including those on plots 71, 72, 72a, 73,73a, 89, 90 and 90a are closer by up to 3m. The houses will be similar to the approved terrace to the south east but less long: this comprises a terrace of seven dwellings. PLANNING POLICY AND STATUS
3.1 The site is identified as a development area in the Area Plan for the South of 2013. In this plan fields 414546 and 411529 are designated as Proposed Residential, field 414532 is designated as Open Space for particular purposes, and field 414214 as Playing Field/POS/Cemetery Extension (proposed). The part of the site which is identified as suitable for residential development is within the extended settlement boundary for Port Erin/Port St. Mary and Rushen in this area. There is a development brief which accompanies this area as a whole which is referred to as Site 23. - 3.2 The development brief is as follows:
4.63 Site 23 Location: Land at Ballakilley, Port Erin/Rushen Size of Site: 17 ha (total) 6.8 ha (Predominantly Residential - Proposed) Previous designation: Field 4050 Open Space (Agriculture) Port Erin Local Plan 1990. The remainder, in Rushen, (identified on the Arbory and East Rushen Local Plan 1999) was identified for Recreation, Civic Uses and Southern Community Hospital, plus an extension to the Rushen Cemetery. Proposed designation: Predominantly Residential (proposed) / Recreation / Open Space / Cemetery Extension Site Assessment Framework (Residential Score): 53/68
cemetery, a sports pitch/training pitch and associated facilities, public open space for play and general amenity and an element of public car parking. Analysis of the current provision of formal open space within Port Erin has been undertaken using the Open Space requirements within the Isle of Man Strategic Plan, 2007 (Appendix 6). This would suggest that based on the 2006 population levels in Port Erin there is a requirement of 6.44 ha of formal open space. The current provision of such land in Port Erin is 2.86 ha. The overall shortfall of 3.58 ha can be accommodated at Ballakilley on the land designated for such uses.
4.64 Development Brief 23 This development brief relates to field numbers 411529, 414546, 414532, 414214.
The land set aside for i. and ii. above does not negate the need to provide adequate public open space on fields 411529 and 414546 in line with Recreation Policy 3 the Isle of Man Strategic Plan, 2007, or its replacement.
3.3 The following Strategic Plan policies are considered relevant in terms of this development:
x) Appendix 7: "New built residential development should be provided with two parking spaces per dwelling, at least one of which should be within the curtilage of the dwelling and behind the front of the dwelling, although the amount and location of parking will vary in respect of development such as terracing, apartments, and sheltered housing.
4.1 The site has been the subject of a previous application which approved the development of 155 dwellings and associated public open space, drainage and road network (PA 13/00777/B). This has been amended in a small number of areas although no change has been made to the overall number of dwellings approved. REPRESENTATIONS - 5.1 Department of Infrastructure Highway Services do not object to the application (27.03.15).
5.2 Rushen Parish Commissioners submitted comments under PA 13/00777/B by mistake but indicate that they support the application and are actively promoting the provision of the public open space associated with the development. - 5.3 Port Erin Commissioners support the application (18.03.15). - 5.4 Department of Health and Social Care originally made the following comments 18.03.15:
"Although the timing of this development and the relatively rapid progress by the developer in building the new homes on this site is in advance of the immediate need for additional affordable homes, these two revisions to the site master plan does increase the overall number of units on the site and this should be reflected in the contribution to affordable housing referred to in Housing Policy 5 of the Strategic Plan 2007."
6.1 The change in house types and numbers will have a number of impacts: firstly on the assessment of the need for affordable housing (Housing Policy 5) and public open space (Recreation Policy 3): secondly on the amount of traffic using the estate roads and highway network more generally; thirdly the appearance of the estate as viewed from inside and without and finally on those existing and proposed properties close by.
6.2 In terms of the impact on affordable housing, as highlighted by DHSC the impact of this development added to the additional dwelling resulting from PA 15/00212/B will add a further 7 dwellings to the total, resulting in a requirement for a further 1.75 dwellings - generally rounded up to 2. As such, a legal agreement should be entered into to provide this. DHSC recommend that this is a commuted sum although the opportunity exists for the dwellings to be provided within this very development. - 6.3 In terms of public open space, there is a significant release of formal playing pitches as part of this development and there is provision within the estate for children's play and amenity space. The proposed development will add to the requirement for this, resulting in an overall deficiency of 30 sq m over and above what was provided in the original development, which over-provided by 166 sq m in these areas. As this is a relatively small amount and there is the opportunity for the provision of further public open space alongside the extension to the cemetery to the north east, it is not proposed that this deficiency in public open space standards is taken as a reason for refusal of the application. - 6.4 There will be an impact on the highways within the estate as well as on those supporting roads in the vicinity. There is no objection from Department of Infrastructure Highway Services and as such it is considered that the estate roads and the local road networks are capable of accommodating the additional traffic from the proposed dwellings. - 6.5 The impact on the streetscene will be that there will be less undeveloped space within the line of dwellings and a slightly less varied streetscene. However, this is a part of the estate which is not generally visible to the public passing the estate and the terraced dwellings are closer to the other higher density properties within the estate. The development provides arguably a better transition between the larger detached dwellings and the smaller, terraced properties already approved in the western corner of the estate. - 6.6 The impact on those in existing and proposed property nearby will be that there will be a greater mass of building but some at a lower height and this will be experienced particularly by 69 - 78, Magherbreekyn. However, these properties are at least 20m away if positioned directly behind the proposed dwellings and as such, it is not considered that the impact on these properties will be such as to warrant refusal of the application. - 6.7 It is interesting that Port Erin Commissioners support the application, perhaps acknowledging the market demand for the smaller dwellings and what is currently needed or desired within their area. It is important that estates maintain variety and interest as well as providing sufficient amenity space and it is considered that even with the proposed changes, the development continues to achieve these.
7.1 It is the position of the Housing Division of Department of Infrastructure that the changes in the layout, number and value of homes now being proposed here, reflecting current demand, has resulted in a higher level of cost per unit and a corresponding lower level of economic gain from the development. Department of Infrastructure Housing also advise that at the current time there are sufficient levels of affordable housing being provided under the existing legal agreement to meet current needs. It is also their belief that the developer is
correct in saying that if they continue to build the layout as originally approved there is likely to be inertia in the market for the larger houses which were approved and this will lead to the development not being completed.
7.2 The situation regarding affordable units is clearly currently changing and this site is not unique in the south in terms of the original agreement for the delivery of affordable housing requiring or desiring change to allow development which is attractive to buyers and tenants to be delivered. In this case there would not appear to be a current need for two further affordable homes in terms of first time buyers or public sector housing in this location on this estate which is the critical issue. Whilst it could be argued that needs may change in years to come, there needs to be a balance between reserving property for potential future need and the desirability of allowing a current development site to continue and be completed, for the benefit of those who see it and those who will live within the estate. - 7.3 It should certainly not be taken that this recommendation, which is that the legal agreement for the affordable housing to be delivered as part of the original layout should not be changed, effectively allowing an increase of 7 dwellings without any corresponding contribution to affordable housing, should represent some sort of precedent for the non application of Housing Policy 5. The recommendation is being made on the basis of the circumstances in which the request is being made and the recommendation of Department of Infrastructure Housing whose responsibility it is amongst their other roles, to assist in the delivery of affordable housing throughout the Island.
PARTY STATUS 7.1 By virtue of the Town and Country Planning (Development Procedure) (No 2) Order 2013, the following persons are automatically interested persons:
With effect from 1 June 2015, the Transfer of Planning & Building Control Functions Order 2015 amends the Town and Country Planning Act 1999 to give effect to the meaning of the word 'Department' to be the Department of Environment, Food and Agriculture unless otherwise directed by that Order.
Recommendation Recommended Decision: Permitted Date of Recommendation: 30.03.2015 Conditions and Notes for Approval: C : Conditions for approval N : Notes attached to conditions
Reason: To comply with article 14 of the Town and Country Planning (Development Procedure) (No2) Order 2013 and to avoid the accumulation of unimplemented planning approvals.
NOTE: The applicant should take all reasonable steps to ensure that roads and footways are usable by those who may be occupying the completed houses whilst construction continues elsewhere on the estate.
Reason: in the interests of highway safety and residential amenity.
NOTE: this may include temporary traffic calming measures to be installed whilst the carriageways are being used by construction traffic as well as permanent features which will be retained once the roads are completed, The applicant should liaise with the Highway Authority in this respect.
Reason: in the interests of highway safety.
Reason: this condition is imposed in order to ensure that reasonable and adequate parking space is provided to meet normal parking demands and avoid the need for vehicles to be parked on the highway where they could adversely affect the safety of other highway users.
This approval relates to drawings 2359.50.02A, 2359.200.01, 2359.200.02, APL_107.01, 2359.200.03, 2359.50.03A, 2359_APL_119.01H and 2359.50.04A all received on 25th February, 2015.
I confirm that this decision has been made by the Planning Committee in accordance with the authority afforded to it under the appropriate delegated authority.
Signed : Miss S E Corlett Presenting Officer
Signatory to delete as appropriate YES/NO
Copyright in submitted documents remains with their authors. Request removal