Loading document...
| Date of Issue: 31st May 2012 | Mr W Greenhow ACMA Chief Secretary |
| Chief Secretary's Office Government Offices Bucks Road Douglas |
Oik yn Ard-Scrudeyr
Our Ref: DF11/0018 Planning Application Ref.No: 11/00990/B
In accordance with paragraph 10 of the above Order, the person appointed by the Council of Ministers to consider this application has submitted her report and in accordance with paragraph 10.3(a) and (b), a copy of the appointed persons report is enclosed.
On the 24th May 2012, and after consideration, the Council of Ministers accepted the recommendation contained within that report and the application was approved subject to the conditions specified below.
| Applicant: | Heritage Homes Ltd |
| Proposal: | Erection of 45 dwellings with associated highway and drainage infrastructure, public open space and landscaping, Parts of Fields 134273,134274,134275,134276 and adjacent Highway east of Gardeners Lane, Poylldooey, Ramsey |
NOTE Council noted that post inquiry correspondence had been submitted to the Chief Secretary's Office (CSO) by Mr D N Sykes which had resulted in a delay between the Report being submitted to the Chief Secretary's Office (CSO) in mid-March and the matter being considered by Council. Mr D N Sykes raised issues of land ownership and planning procedures in respect of a previous planning application and certain substantive points relating to this application.
Council were advised that the Inspector had, following enquiries directed to her by CSO, confirmed that the issues raised by Mr Sykes were historic and were raised at the planning inquiry.
Advice has also been sought from the Planning and Building Control Division of the Department of Infrastructure (the Department) regarding whether the planning enforcement matters raised by Mr Sykes were such that Council was at risk of proceeding to determine this application under a misapprehension of relevant facts or whether he raised a material issue which, if correct, would make any decision reached by Council open to challenge.
The Department was not able to provide confirmation in the timescale available, however the advice received was that, on balance, Council was in a position to make a determination.
Council also agreed that any relevant enforcement matters would rest with the Department of Infrastructure.
Copyright in submitted documents remains with their authors. Request removal