Installation of replacement windows and rendering works (retrospective)

Policy R/E/P6

There will be a general presumption in favour of retention of traditional uniform frontages on all pre-1920's buildings

Policy R/TC/P5

The area north west of Neptune Street shall be used for harbour related purposes only

9.22 In conjunction with Policy R/TC/P5, a Traffic Management Scheme should be prepared including consideration for partial pedestrianisation for a limited amount of time each day along Market Hill, Parliament Street (as far westwards as Christian Street), Court Row and Cannells Lane. ## Policy R/TC/P8 Outbuildings/Warehouses at rear of Parliament Street (North Side) East of Christian Street

General Policy 2

Development which is in accordance with the land-use zoning and proposals in the appropriate Area Plan

General Policy 2: Development which is in accordance with the land-use zoning and proposals in the appropriate Area Plan and with other policies of this Strategic Plan will normally be permitted, provided that the development: (a) is in accordance with the design brief in the Area Plan where there is such a brief; (b) respects the site and surroundings in terms of the siting, layout, scale, form, design and landscaping of buildings and the spaces around them; (c) does not affect adversely the character of the surrounding landscape or townscape; (d) does not adversely affect the protected wildlife or locally important habitats on the site or adjacent land, including water courses; (e) does not affect adversely public views of the sea; (f) incorporates where possible existing topography and landscape features, particularly trees and sod banks; (g) does not affect adversely the amenity of local residents or the character of the locality; (h) provides satisfactory amenity standards in itself, including where appropriate safe and convenient access for all highway users, together with adequate parking, servicing and manoeuvring space; (i) does not have an unacceptable effect on road safety or traffic flows on the local highways; (j) can be provided with all necessary services; (k) does not prejudice the use or development of adjoining land in accordance with the appropriate Area Plan; (l) is not on contaminated land or subject to unreasonable risk of erosion or flooding; (m) takes account of community and personal safety and security in the design of buildings and the spaces around them; and (n) is designed having due regard to best practice in reducing energy consumption. 6.3 Development outside of areas zoned for development

Environment Policy 10

Where development is proposed on any site where in the opinion of the Department of Local Government and the Environment there is a potential risk of flooding

irements of the relevant gas supply agency. Flood Risk 63 There was widespread concern about the adequacy of drainage and the risk of flooding, particularly in parts of Braddan, Onchan and Laxey. Environment Policy 10 of the Strategic Plan indicates that where development is proposed on any site where there is a potential risk of flooding, the prospective developer will be required to submit a flood risk assessment, together with details of proposed mitigation measures. This approach is reinforced in Utilities Proposal 6 of the draft Area Plan, which (among other things) requires the incorporation of Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS) into new developments, to attenuate the rate of surface water run-off. I consider these policies to be reasonable. Clearly, without adequate mitigation measures, new building should normally be resisted on land which is at serious risk of flooding, or where the proposed development would increase the flood risk elsewhere. 64 In my view, the format of Utilities Proposal 6 could be improved. First, as a Proposal of the Area Plan, I consider that it should be in a bold typeface, to differentiate it from the supporting text. (The same applies to a number of other policies e.g. Transport Policy 2, and Utilities Policies 2 and 5). Second, there appears to be an error of syntax at the start of the second sentence of Utilities Proposal 6, which should perhaps read 'Strategies to achieve this will include …'. Third, the third bullet point of this Proposal introduces SuDS. Subsequent bullet points describe features of SuDS, and are therefore subordinate to the third bullet point. For clarity, I consider that they should be indented. I recommend that the draft Area Plan be modified accordingly. Sewage Treatment 65 There was also some public concern about the adequacy of the sewerage system, both in terms of its capacity to accommodate the effluent from proposed residential development areas, and in terms of the current practice of discharging untreated sewage into the sea. Infrastructure Policy 1 of the Strategic Plan indicates that developments entailing the erection of multiple dwellings should take place only on sites that will ultimately be connected to the IRIS system, which takes sewage to a treatment works at Meary Veg. (IRIS is an acronym for Integration and Recycling of the Island's Sewage). However, as long ago as 2006/7, a review was undertaken to decide whether to continue with the IRIS strategy. This concluded that it would be beneficial to adopt a regional sewage treatment strategy (RSTS) for those settlements that were not already connected to the IRIS system, including Laxey, Baldrine and settlements in the Central Valley. To that extent, Infrastructure Policy 1 of the Strategic Plan is now out of date. 66 I understand that a planning application will soon be submitted for the development of a local sewage treatment facility for Laxey. Feasibility studies for the provision of a similar facility to serve Baldrine are ongoing. A replacement sewage works at Ballagarey, serving part of the Central Valley became operational in 2018. However, capacity limitations mean that planned development in Crosby is likely to have to rely on standalone sewage treatment for the time being, until the existing treatment works is replaced as anticipated in 2022. The Programme for Government (2016-2021) indicates an intention to complete the regional sewage treatment infrastructure within the lifetime of the present administration. 67 It seems to me that these considerations should be taken into account in the allocation and phasing of land for development. I will return to this matter when considering the draft Area Plan's proposals for housing. Electricity Renewable Energy 68 Peel Energy considered that the Area Plan should contain a detailed and specific chapter on renewable energy, providing measurable criteria against which applications for the development of renewable power generating facilities would be assessed. They cited the States of Jersey Island Plan 2011, which includes such material. And they pointed out that a Climate Change Emergency has recently been declared on the Isle of Man; that a Climate Change Bill is soon to be presented to Tynwald; and that there has been strong public support for the Government's Climate Change Mitigation Strategy. They argued that, in failing to provide detailed guidance on renewable power generation, the Area Plan was inconsistent with the Strategic Plan; and that since the Area Plan post-dated the Strategic Plan, its largely negative provisions would prevail. 69 Energy Policy 4 of the Strategic Plan applies to development proposals for renewable energy generated by wind, water, tidal or solar power. It indicates that any such proposals will be judged against that Plan's environmental objectives. Proposals for wind, water or tidal power would need to be supported by an Environmental Impact Assessment. The supporting text indicates that renewable energy schemes will be given similar scrutiny as is gi

Environment Policy 35

Within Conservation Areas, the Department will permit only development which would preserve or enhance the character of appearance of the area

Environment Policy 35: Within Conservation Areas, the Department will permit only development which would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Area, and will ensure that the special features contributing to the character and quality are protected against inappropriate development. 7.30 Development adjacent to Conservation Areas 7.30.1 It is often the case that important views into and out of a Conservation Area can contribute significantly to its character. It is necessary to assess the impact any development adjacent to conservation areas may have on such views.

Planning Circular 1/98: The Alteration and Replacement of Windows

replacement windows which would be readily visible from a public thoroughfare MUST HAVE THE SAME method of opening as the originals

Planning Circular 1/98 # THE ALTERATION AND REPLACEMENT OF WINDOWS The Department of Infrastructure Planning And Building Control Division Murray House Mount Havelock Douglas Isle of Man IM1 2SF July 1998 # THE ALTERATION AND REPLACEMENT OF WINDOWS ## INTRODUCTION 1. This Planning Circular sets down the Department's policies in respect of the alteration or replacement of windows. These policies vary according to the age, merit and location of the building. For ease of use, the Circular divides buildings into several categories, and sets out the policies and reasoning for each category. ## NEED FOR PLANNING APPROVAL 2. This Circular should be read in conjunction with the recent Permitted Development Order (S.D. 664/97). The effect of the Order is that, with certain exceptions, the installation of a window in an existing aperture in a building erected after 1920 does not require planning approval. The exceptions are - a) Where the building is a registered building or in a conservation area, or in an area in respect of which the Planning Committee has passed a resolution to the effect that planning approval is required for such work; or b) Where the work would be in breach of a condition imposed on the grant of planning approval. ## GENERAL REASONING 3. The appearance of any building is strongly influenced by the detailing of its windows. The character and integrity of a building are usually best preserved by the retention and repair of the original windows, or, if this is not possible, the installation of replacements which respond suitably to the original design. In this context, "original" means those windows which were installed in the building at the time of its construction. If you are in doubt as to whether the existing windows are the originals, the staff in the Office of Planning may be able to give advice. ## BUILDING CATEGORIES 4. For the purposes of this Circular, buildings have been divided into the following categories:- a) Registered Buildings b) Buildings in Conservation Areas c) Buildings erected before 1921 and not falling within a) or b) which have largely retained their original character d) Other buildings erected before 1921 e) Buildings constructed after 1920 which do not fall into category a) or b) and which are not subject to previous planning conditions restricting the installation of replacement windows. Subsequent paragraphs of this Circular deal with each category in turn. ## Category a) REGISTERED BUILDINGS 5. Policy If the original windows are still in place they should preferably be repaired. If repair is impracticable, replacement windows MUST BE THE SAME as the originals in all respects, including the method of opening, materials and detailed design. This policy will be strictly applied other than where the particular circumstances are so exceptional as to justify a relaxation. Reasons for Policy: Registered Buildings are those buildings which are judged to be of special architectural or historic interest and which are already entered into the Protected Buildings register. Because of their special status, these buildings merit particular care and any work carried out by way of repair or alteration requires Registered Building Consent. Planning Approval and Registered Building Consent ARE ALWAYS required. Category b) BUILDINGS IN CONSERVATION AREAS 6. Policy If the original windows are in place they should preferably be repaired. If repair is impracticable, replacement windows which would be readily visible from a public thoroughfare MUST HAVE THE SAME method of opening as the originals. Whatever the material used in their construction, the windows MUST HAVE THE SAME pattern and section of glazing bars and the same frame sections as the original windows. Windows not readily visible from a public thoroughfare must have the same or similar pattern of glazing bars as the originals, but not necessarily the original method of opening, whatever the material used in the construction. Reasons for Policy: The Department has a duty to determine which parts of the Island are areas of special architectural or historic interest, the character of which it is desirable to preserve or enhance, and shall by order designate such areas as Conservation Areas. Planning Approval is required for all external works to properties in Conservation Areas to ensure that any proposals are in keeping with not only the individual building, but the special character and quality of the area as a whole. Planning Approval IS REQUIRED for alteration or replacement of window in the category of buildings. Category c) BUILDINGS ERECTED BEFORE 1921 AND NOT FALLING WITHIN CATEGORIES a) OR b) WHICH HAVE LARGELY RETAINED THEIR ORIGINAL CHARACTER 7. For ease of use, this category has been divided into two, based on the location of the building: i) Buildings in an Urban Setting Policy In the individual building, or group of buildings, whose principal elevations are readily visible from a public thoroughfare, if the original windows are in place, it may be possible to repair and renovate them. This can take place without permission, and will be encouraged by the Department. If repair is impracticable, or existing windows are not the originals, the preference will be for replacement windows in the said principal elevations to have the same method of opening as the originals. Whatever the materials used in their construction, the windows MUST HAVE the same or similar pattern and section of glazing bars and the same or similar frame sections as the original windows. Windows are not part of the principal elevations and which are not readily visible from a public thoroughfare should preferably have the same or similar pattern of glazing bars as the originals, but not necessarily the original method of opening, whatever the material used in their construction. Reasons for Policy: In many of our towns there are individual and groups of buildings which, although not worthy of Registration and not located in Conservation Areas, make a most important contribution to the local townscape; e.g. prominent corner sites or terraces. Where these buildings remain substantially unaltered, the aim is to encourage their enhancement in response to the original architectural concept. Planning Approval IS REQUIRED for alterations or replacement windows in this category of buildings. ii) Buildings in a rural setting Policy In an individual building, or group of buildings, whose principal elevations are readily visible from a public thoroughfare, if the original windows are in place, it may be possible to repair and renovate them. This can take place without permission, and will be encouraged by the Department. If repair is impracticable or the existing windows are not the originals, the preference will be for replacement windows on the said principal elevations, to have the same method of opening as the originals. Whatever the material used in their construction, the windows MUST HAVE the same or similar pattern and section of glazing bars and the same or similar frame sections as the original windows. Windows not part of the principal elevations and which are not readily visible from a public thoroughfare should preferable have the same or similar pattern of glazing bars as the originals, but not necessarily the original method of opening, whatever the material use in their construction. Reasons for Policy: The Island is fortunate in that it still retains a considerable number of unspoilt traditional vernacular buildings which epitomise the quality of the rural landscape. These buildings may not be worthy of Registration, and may not be located in Conservation Areas, but they do make a most important contribution to the traditional character of the rural landscape. Where these buildings remain substantially unaltered, the aim is to encourage their enhancement whilst preserving the original vernacular style. Planning Approval IS REQUIRED for alteration or replacement of windows in this category of buildings. Category d) OTHER BUILDINGS ERECTED BEFORE 1921 8. Policy Replacement windows should preferably be the same or as similar to the originals in the pattern of the glazing bars. However, provided that the glazing pattern is retained, a more relaxed approach will be taken to the replacement of windows in such properties. Reasons for Policy: Many buildings fall within this category and although there is little in the way of restriction, the aim is to encourage simulation of the original glazing pattern and this will apply particularly to buildings which are part of a larger group, such as a terrace, where replacement windows, if carefully designed, may serve to enhance the overall appearance of the group. Planning Approval IS REQUIRED for alteration or replacement of windows in this category of buildings. Category e) BUILDINGS CONSTRUCTED AFTER 1920 WHICH DO NOT FALL INTO CATEGORIES a) OR b) AND WHICH ARE NOT SUBJECT TO PREVIOUS PLANNING CONDITIONS RESTRICTING THE INSTALLATION OF REPLACEMENT WINDOWS. 9. The installation of replacement windows in these buildings does not require planning approval. The Department nevertheless recommends that the design of such windows should respect the architectural style of the building. ## FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE 10. Attention is drawn to the fact that the repair of existing windows or the installation of replacement windows may qualify for grant assistance under Financial Assistance Schemes which the Department operates. Further information regarding the availability of Grant Assistance is obtainable from the Finance Section of the Department. ## REVOCATION AND STATUS 11. Planning Circular 2/93 (Replacing External Doors and Windows) is herby withdrawn. 12. This Circular is issued by the Department in accordance with Article 11 (2)(a)(vi) of the Isle of Man Planning Scheme (Development Plan) Order 1982. 13. Further advice or information is available from: The Planning Office Department of Infrastructure 1st Floor Murray House Mount Havelock Douglas Isle of Man .