Loading document...
Application No.: 25/90397/B Applicant: Manx Telecom Proposal: Installation of 4 telegraph poles to provide Fibre Optic connectivity to 1-19 Corrins Way & 1-27 Creggans Avenue Site Address: Creggans Avenue And Corrins Way Peel IM5 1DF Planning Officer: Hamish Laird Photo Taken: 05.08.2025 Site Visit: 05.08.2025 Expected Decision Level: Planning Committee Recommended Decision: Permitted Date of Recommendation: 11.08.2025 _________________________________________________________________ Approval Reason(s) and Conditions A. The proposal would not create any visual harm or deleterious intrusion into the streetscene and would conform to those parts of Strategic Policy 1,4b, Spatial Policy 1, General Policy 2(b,c,g,i,m) Environment Policy 22 and Infrastructure Policy 3. - C 1. The development hereby approved shall be begun before the expiration of four years from the date of this decision notice. Reason: To comply with Article 26 of the Town and Country Planning (Development Procedure) Order 2019 and to avoid the accumulation of unimplemented planning approvals. - C 2. Unless otherwise approved in writing by the Department, any telecommunications cabinet, mounted equipment or wooden telegraph poles must be removed from the land on which it is situated, within 6 months of it no longer being required for telecommunications purposes, and such land must be restored to its condition before the development took place, so far as is practicable. Reason: To ensure that any redundant infrastructure is removed and to comply with Strategic Plan Infrastructure Policy 3. _________________________________________________________________ Right to Appeal It is recommended that the following organisations should be given the Right to Appeal on the basis that they have submitted a relevant objection: - - Peel Town Commissioners. It is recommended that the following organisations should NOT be given the Right to Appeal: - - Department of Infrastructure Highways Services (no objection). - It is recommended that the following persons should be given the right of appeal because they live either within 20.0m of the site boundary; or, would be connected to the site via the proposed cabling: - - Corrins Way; No's: 2, 19; - - Creggans Avenue: 1, 3, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 11A, 17, 23, 25, 27; - - Cronk Reayrt: 1, 3; It is recommended that the following persons should NOT be given the right of appeal: - - The MHK for Glenfaba and Peel - Objection does not identify land that is owned or occupied by the objector that would be impacted on. - - Cair View, 36 Mountain View, Peel - Objection identifies land that is owned or occupied by the objector that would be impacted on, but such land is not within 20 metres of the site (and no Environmental Impact Assessment is required)
_________________________________________________________________ Officer’s Report
THIS APPLICATION HAS BEEN REFERRED TO THE PLANNING COMMITTEE GIVEN THE LEVEL OF OBJECTION AND THE OBJECTION FROM THE LOCAL AUTHORITY AND THE APPLICATION IS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL
1.0 THE SITE - 1.1 The application site is identified in red is concerned with the pavements of 1-19 Corrins Way & 1-27 Creggans Avenue, Peel. The site sits within a wider residential estate and is broadly accessed from Creggans Avenue, and the A27 Glenfaba Road to the east. The properties are located on a level site with Creggans Avenue leading into Corrin's Way, with a small offshoot serving 3 properties at Glenfaba Park. Both Corrin's Way and Glenfaba Park are cul-de-sacs. - 1.2 The dwellings here are a mixture of two-storey, semi-detached, dwellings which are set back from the road. There is one detached dwelling located at No. 21 Corrins Way. - 1.3 These properties essentially front onto the highway and are generally set back from the edge of the pavement with the front apron to the properties being used for car parking and landscaped front gardens laid to lawn with some soft and hard landscaping. The properties have dwarf brick work walls with a cap stone atop and behind are hedges/ planting behind fronting to the pavement. - 1.4 The pavements here vary in width and connect all the properties in the wider estate and finished with tarmacadam with dropped kerbs to each residential property. Within the rear of the pavements are sporadic metal columns for street lighting located on the west of the highway.
2.0 THE PROPOSAL - 2.1 Planning permission is being sought for the installation of FOUR x 9m tall wooden telegraph poles with associated overhead network cables for the provision of fibre broadband internet. Off each of these poles would be a series of network cables that would radiate out to the respective properties. The diameter of the timber poles range between 250mm and 300mm and would project between 7m-7.5m above the ground level with 1.5-2m below ground. The posts would installed via an auger into a bored hole with a width of 400mm600mm. - 2.2 The poles would be located within the public footpath adjacent to the boundary and on the divide between the following properties:
2.3 The applicant 'Manx Telecom' notes: "Installation of the telegraph pole will allow the premises to become "Passed" and allow property owners to place orders with their chosen service provider. Overhead wires that are required to span between poles are referred to as network cables and these will be installed at the same time as the telegraph poles. Once a property owner has placed an order with their chosen service provider, a Drop cable will then be installed between the serving pole and the property, in agreement with the property owner. This would now become a property "Connected" ". - 2.4 The premises eligible to be connected to the new telegraph pole (46 properties) are referenced:
2.5 The proposal aims to deliver a replacement for the existing copper cable with a more modern fibre optic cable as part of the expansion of the Islands fibre network and as part of the "copper switch off programme" for the transition to the delivery of broadband and telephone systems to those affected properties.
3.1 The application site has not been subject to any relevant planning history that is considered pertinent in this instance. - 3.2 Of note are similar applications that have been approved referenced:
3.3 The following applications have all been refused by the planning committee because; "The proposed installation of wooden telegraph poles and their associated cabling amongst the street scene of bungalows due to the height, size and scale of the proposals would have a negative visual impact that adversely affects the character of the street scene and would be contrary to General Policy 2 (b & c) of the Strategic Plan".
3.4 There are seven other planning applications for similar telecoms development in Peel
(6) and Glen Vine (1) which are pending consideration. These are:
4.1 The application site is mainly within an area recognised as being an area of "Predominantly Residential" under the Draft Area Plan for the North and West (2022), Map No.6 Peel. - 4.2 Within the written statement accompanying the area plan, broader "Telecommunications" are broadly supported though the Area Plan Objectives are para 7.4 (page 59) where it says "iv. To provide and support the best quality telecommunications networks and to support the economy by doing so"… and further supported through paragraphs 7.13 and encapsulated as a policy guidance depicted below (from page 70);
Telecommunications Proposal 1 New developments should:
4.3 The site is not within a designated Conservation Area or within an area identified as being at flood risk from tidal or surface water flooding. There are no registered trees / tree areas identified on / adjacent to the application site. - 4.4 The Isle of Man Strategic Plan 2016 contains the following policies that are considered specifically material to the assessment of this application; Strategic Policy
Environment Policy 22 (iii) Safeguarding the environment and/or the amenities of surrounding properties
Infrastructure Policy
4.5 Permitted Development Order 2025, Schedule 1, Part 1 Statutory Undertakings; Class 10 - Electric Supply (a) electric line - which includes the supporting poles. Class 12 - Street furniture (a-j) Varying items that are considered street furniture. - 4.6 Town and Country Planning (Telecommunications) Development Order 2019 (in part).
4.7 The Climate Change Plan 2022-2027 has an overarching series of strategies and policies that are considered materially relevant to the assessment of this application which promotes a more sustainable approach to living and working, one of which is remote / home working and learning. - 4.8 National Telecoms Infrastructure committee report, September 2017 which concluded; "If the Island is to stay ahead of the curve and become a world leader in telecoms we will need appropriate sustained investment, an efficient shared infrastructure and the innovation and confidence to challenge barriers to deploying new technology. The importance of increasing the speed of broadband as a priority across the Island is clear". - 4.9 National Telecommunications Strategy, October 2018 which concluded; "The National Telecoms strategy, laid out in six themes, looks to set a direction of travel by which the Island's telecom infrastructure can be recognised as being world class. It defines strategic outcomes to make it happen, in regulation and legislation, a national broadband plan, subsea cables and planning and wayleaves. The Government has made it clear that enhanced telecoms infrastructure is a top priority. "The Isle of Man Government is determined to support the development of telecoms infrastructure which meets the needs of both businesses and the public now and into the future". - 4.10 The National Broadband Plan, outlined in the Isle of Man's National Telecoms Strategy, sets out to deliver Island wide ultrafast fibre broadband to more than 99% of the Island's premises with Manx Telecom as the preferred supplier to enable over 40,000 premises (residential and commercial) to have 'access' to the fibre network. Given the diversity of the Isle of Man's landscape and the remote nature of some of the properties, the Isle of Man Government has recognised that delivery of fibre broadband to some areas would be commercially unviable and that funding should be made available to ensure that properties in nine intervention zones will have access to the Fibre. This project, was initiated in July 2020 and is set to conclude by August 2024.
4.11 Commissions Act 2021 (Schedule 5; Part 11- Power to fly lines) - 4.12 Cabinet Siting and Pole Siting, Code of Practice, Issue 2; November 2016. (UK Guidance for best practice). - 4.13 Assessment of the Impact of the National Broadband Plan on Telecoms Regulation. Publication Number: 16/20 from Communications Commission. - 4.14 The Island Plan 2023; Within the section entitled "Outstanding lifelong learning and development opportunities for all" the plan says; "Ensure that public services are increasingly digitally-enabled, and residents have access to fast, reliable internet via the Island's National Broadband Plan to create enhanced opportunities for learning in the Digital Age." - 4.15 The Island Plan was Updated in March 2024 and notes on;
5.0 REPRESENTATIONS (this report only contain summaries - full reps can be read online) STATUTORY CONSULTEES
5.1 Peel Town Commissioners commented (29/05/25) - Objection - comments as follows:
The Commissioners would like to oppose planning applications 25/90395/B, 25/90396/B, 25/90397/B, 25/90398/B, 25/90399/B, 25/90400/B and 25/90402/B Installation of telegraph poles to provide fibre optic connectivity at Rheast Bridson, Links Close, Creggans Avenue, Corrins Way, Bellevue Park, and Ballaquane Park respectively. The reason the Commissioners oppose these applications is as follows:
The erection of telegraph poles with overhead wiring will created a clutter the street scene and will be unsightly for a modern residential urban environment.
The Strategic Plan Infrastructure Policy 3 states:
"A balance must be struck between the need for new, evolving communication systems to satisfy residential and business demand and the impact the necessary infrastructure will have upon the environment."
The Peel Local Plan emphasises the need for a quality residential environment through policy
5.15 stating: "Comprehensive landscaping proposals will be required as part of future submissions."
In terms of the highway infrastructure and environment guidance was provided in Manx Roads: A guide to the design of residential roads, footways, parking and services. This document introduced the need for services to be placed underground either in footways or under designation service verges/strips. This longstanding document was superseded in 2021 by the Manual for Manx Roads (GN-00-019 Rev2). This document again emphasises the need to build a quality environment and reduce clutter as per sections 5.5.1 and 5,5.3 respectively:
Section 5.5.3 goes on to state: "Manual for Streets covers a range of techniques to help reduce the clutter of unnecessary street furniture on the highway."
These techniques for public utility services including street furniture are laid out in Statutory Undertaker Service Section (Section 11.1.35 to 11.1.36)
Section 11.1.36 states: "The approved relative locations of the various services beneath a footway and service verge, as agreed by the Manx Joint Utilities Group are shown in our standard construction details."
All these planning policies and guidance documents encourage the reduction is street furniture and improve the residential street environment through placing statutory undertaker's communication services underground. These planning applications seek to ignore these planning policies and guidance.
Thank you for considering the Commissioners' views.
5.2 DoI: Highways Services do not object (29/04/25) but comment; "After reviewing this Application, Highway Services HDC finds it to have no significant negative impact upon highway safety, network functionality and/or parking as at least 1.2m footway width is maintained around the poles." NEIGHBOUR REPRESENTATIONS (in brief) - 5.3 Nineteen comments raising OBJECTION have been received from a number of properties in the affected street against the proposals. These include a circular letter raising the same points and signed by the occupants from 16 addresses. The objections have been received from occupants of the following properties:
Corrins Way; No's: 2, 19, Creggans Avenue: 1 (2 reps), 3, 5, 6, 7, 10, 11, 11A, 17, 23 (2 reps) 27, Cronk Reayrt, Peel: 1, 3 Cair View, 36 Mountain View, Peel;
The MHK for Glenfaba and Peel has also written raising objections to the proposals Between them the objectors raise the following material planning considerations that have been thematically categorised: General Development impacts:
6.0 ASSESSMENT The pertinent issues to consider in the assessment of this planning application are whether there is any adverse impact upon:
PRINCIPLE
6.1 The general planning principle of development from a land use perspective would comply with Poilcy Sp2 as Peel is a Service Centre in the strategic plan and the site is identified on the Draft Area Plan for the North and West, Peel - Map 6 as within the settlement boundary of Peel and zoned as residential which ensures the site is broadly designated for development. Given the site is within a defined residential area the general development control principles of GP2 would also be relevant, as discussed below.
6.2 Furthermore the proposals would seek to comply with Strategic Policy 1c as the applicants are seeking to expand on existing telecoms infrastructure (located below ground) to facilitate service delivery within in the immediate vicinity.
6.3 It must be noted that whilst there is PDO specific for telecoms equipment under the 2019 Order, this proposal would not comply with those Schedules 1 & 2 as noted in para 4.13
6.4 As such the broad principle of development would be supported through compliance with Sp1 and Stp1c. NECESSITY - 6.5 This application essentially responds to the Governments strategic direction to expand on the existing fibre broadband coverage and as noted in the Island plan and its update in 2024, which also has a direct ambition to grow the number of economically active new
6.20 When standing on the site, the level of visual intrusion into the streetscene can be subjective and it is accepted at present there are no telegraph poles in the streetscene. However, the introduction of the poles and cabling would be different and their use would be utilitarian as too would their appearance and certainly different from the existing method of delivery. It is accepted that this approach can be seen as a retrograde step and is not without its criticisms as noted from the level of objection from affected residents. - 6.21 Equally the proposals would be read against the residential context of the streetscene where the pole height would broadly be similar in height with ridges of the surrounding twostorey, semi-detached properties, as would the cabling between the poles and the properties which would be above eaves level. However, noting the level of objection to the proposals and considering this level of "different" service delivery, in terms of overall visual impact, it would not be so great to be considered an incongruous feature on the wider streetscape. - 6.22 Whilst this proposal would be introducing further "street furniture" in addition to the exiting street lighting into the streetscape of bungalows where at present there are no wooden telegraph poles, they would equally be visible from within those respective properties facing out onto the poles. However, this visual aspect could be more aligned with an individual's view and outlook. Whilst there will be views of the proposals from within the dwelling houses, this would be a view and the loss of a view or interruption of a view is not a material planning consideration. - 6.23 Furthermore it must be acknowledged that the level of development that can be undertaken within Statutory Undertakings as part of the Permitted Development Order 2025, would equally add to the character of a streetscene through the installation of either street furniture or electrical infrastructure (plant, equipment, apparatus, poles, cabling, cabinets etc.) but not necessarily to its detriment and would not require a formal planning application. - 6.24 In terms of similar applications we can cross-reference to former planning applications on the Island (noted in planning history above) which proposed the same method of installation of fibre broadband via wooden telegraph poles and has now been approved and implemented in Ballamillagyhn Estate. - 6.25 When visiting Ballamillagyhn, the telegraph poles have been installed and the suspended cabling evident that is now connecting the majority of the estate when counting the cablings serving a number of properties which indicates many residents have opted to upgrade to the Ultra-Fast Broadband network. In terms of visual impact here it is noted that the poles do not visually detract from the character of the streetscene and do not result in any substantive visual harm to the site and surrounding area. - 6.26 On balance, the overall siting of the poles and their inherent cabling and the level of visual impact would not be considered to adversely affect the character of this part of the residential estate and would be read in accordance with GP2,c. IMPACT UPON RESIDENTIAL AMENITY - 6.27 As part of the application the applicant notes; "In parallel to submitting the application, we will write to and inform the following parties:
Corrins Way; Creggans Avenue; and, Cronk Reayrt residents - Information letter outlining the planning application been submitted. Peel Town Commissioners - Letter informing of application".
However, taking on board the comments noted above, essentially regarding the unsightly appearance of the broadband infrastructure and its archaic approach to service delivery, the proposal by its nature being a wooden pole outside off the residential curtilages ensures that
the residential amenities would not be materially affected through any loss of light, overbearing impact or loss of privacy as a result of the installation.
6.28 In so far as the comments received and as noted, seeking the cables be installed below ground, it is noted in the applicants' statement on underground duct/trenching that: "Bellevue Park does not have sufficient existing underground ducting to use and therefore to make fibre available to the estate, the installation of 8 telegraph poles is required ". Quote taken from their supporting statement. - 6.29 In terms of alternative options that have been considered the applicants have noted the following;
6.30 With this in mind, it can be assumed that there are times when it may not be possible to run a cable / ducting underground due to the congestion of underground utility services (sewers, gas, water and electricity). The chosen method of installing telegraph poles would enable rapid infrastructure deployment of a new broadband network to this small part of the wider estate without costly and disruptive roadworks than installing underground cables crossing the highways/ footpaths. (To which it has been noted the DOI seek full width restoration of the footpaths.) - 6.31 The objections received from residents are noted. The proposed connectivity arising from the proposal to serve this part of the residential estate with the opportunity for faster broadband would have a uniform appearance throughout. Of those forty-six properties to be connected, there are nineteen written objections with one from the MHK for Peel who is not a local resident but is writing in on behalf of her constituents. It is clear the residents are against the proposals to use above ground fibre broadband via poles and cables. However, given the planning policies and legislative documentation as noted above, to refuse the application based on residents requests when the principle, need and visual impact is considered to be acceptable could have a deleterious impact on the ability to provide improved broadband service and being denied critical infrastructure which is contrary to policy. Furthermore, future occupants of the properties could equally be disadvantaged. - 6.32 However if approved, this is at the applicants commercial discretion whether to implement or not and would be subject to the demand for faster broadband in the area, i.e. if there is no demand or uptake for the newer broadband, the applicants could take the commercial decision not to install the poles but reserve the option to install as an when customers require connecting within the life of any approval. - 6.33 As such this aspect would not adversely affect the amenity standards of neighbouring properties and would accord with GP2g. IMPACT UPON HIGHWAY SERVICES - 6.34 In terms of the proposals it will in places limit the width of the pavement but only for a minor amount for the width of the pole (approx. 250-300mm) it is noted Highways services do not oppose the proposals for marginally narrowing the pavement. In most instances of siting the telegraph poles, there would remain a min. clearance of 1200mm wide on the pavement for pedestrian use (as noted in 5.1.4 of Manual for Manx Roads) and where the speed limit is lower than 30mph and this would be over a very short distance. As such this aspect would be acceptable and conform to GP2i.
7.1 For the above reasons, it is concluded that the benefits of providing the required improvements in broadband / fibre connectivity to increase network coverage are considered to outweigh the very limited visual harm and the level of objection resulting from the proposed development. Greater material weight is attributed to the context of the Government's ambition in the Island Plan to improve public infrastructure in line with the National Telecommunications Strategy and its National Broadband Plan.
7.2 On this basis, it is considered that the proposal would not create any visual harm or deleterious intrusion into the streetscene and would conform to those parts of Strategic Policy 1,4b, Spatial Policy 1, General Policy 2(b,c,g,i,m) Environment Policy 22 and Infrastructure Policy 3. - 8.0 RIGHT TO APPEAL AND RIGHT TO GIVE EVIDENCE
8.1 The Town and Country Planning (Development Procedure) Order 2019 sets out the process for determining planning applications (including appeals). It sets out a Right to Appeal (i.e. to submit an appeal against a planning decision) and a Right to Give Evidence at Appeals (i.e. to participate in an appeal if one is submitted).
8.2 Article A10 sets out that the right to appeal is available to:
8.3 Article 8(2)(a) requires that in determining an application, the Department must decide who has a right to appeal, in accordance with the criteria set out in article A10. - 8.4 The Order automatically affords the Right to Give Evidence to the following (no determination is required):
I confirm that this decision has been made by the Planning Committee in accordance with the authority afforded to that body by the appropriate DEFA Delegation and that in making this decision the Committee has agreed the recommendation in relation to who should be afforded interested person status and/or rights to appeal.
Decision Made: Permitted Date: 26.08.2025 Signed : Hamish Laird Presenting Officer
Customer note This copy of the officer report reflects the content of the office copy and has been produced inthis form for the benefit of our online service/customers and archive record.
Application No. : 25/90397/B Applicant : Manx Telecom Proposal : Installation of 4 telegraph poles to provide Fibre Optic connectivity to 1-19 Corrins Way & 1-27 Creggans Avenue Site Address : Creggans Avenue And Corrins Way Peel IM5 1DF Presenting Officer : Hamish Laird (correct manually if not the case officer)
At the Committee Meeting on 26/8/25, Members voted 3-3 to reject the Officer recommendation and voted 3-3 to Refuse the application. In both instances, the Chairman used his casting vote to vote against the Officer recommendation and for the refusal of the application. The application was refused for the following reason:
The proposed installation of FOUR wooden telegraph poles and their associated cabling amongst the streetscene of 2-storey, semi-detached dwellings, would due to the height, size and scale of the telegraph poles, result in a negative visual impact which would adversely affect the character of the streetscene to an unacceptable degree. As such, the proposed development would be contrary to the provisions of General Policy 2 b), c), and h) of the Isle of Man Strategic Plan 2016. _____________________________________________________________________________
Copyright in submitted documents remains with their authors. Request removal
