12 September 2025 · Committee
Street Record, C1242, Peel, Isle Of Man, IM5 1pu
Permission was sought to install five wooden telegraph poles and associated cabling in the pavements along Ballaquane Park, Peel, to provide fibre optic connectivity to properties at numbers 7–13 and 21–39. The site sits within a wider residential estate characterised by traditional bungalows and chalet bungalows. The Department of Environment, Food and Agriculture refused the application on 12 September 2025. The decision was made by Committee, overturning the case officer's recommendation to approve. The sole stated reason for refusal was that the height, size, and scale of the five telegraph poles would create a negative visual impact that would adversely affect the character of the streetscene to an unacceptable degree, given the predominantly low-rise bungalow setting.
The Department of Environment, Food and Agriculture refused the application. The five wooden telegraph poles were considered too tall and bulky for a streetscene made up predominantly of bungalows and chalet bungalows, and their height, size, and scale would harm the character of the area to an unacceptable degree.
Refusal Reasons
Infrastructure Policy 3
Need for communications infrastructure versus environmental impacts
General Policy 2
General Development Considerations (b,c,g,i,m)
General Policy 2: Development which is in accordance with the land-use zoning and proposals in the appropriate Area Plan and with other policies of this Strategic Plan will normally be permitted, provided that the development: (a) is in accordance with the design brief in the Area Plan where there is such a brief; (b) respects the site and surroundings in terms of the siting, layout, scale, form, design and landscaping of buildings and the spaces around them; (c) does not affect adversely the character of the surrounding landscape or townscape; (d) does not adversely affect the protected wildlife or locally important habitats on the site or adjacent land, including water courses; (e) does not affect adversely public views of the sea; (f) incorporates where possible existing topography and landscape features, particularly trees and sod banks; (g) does not affect adversely the amenity of local residents or the character of the locality; (h) provides satisfactory amenity standards in itself, including where appropriate safe and convenient access for all highway users, together with adequate parking, servicing and manoeuvring space; (i) does not have an unacceptable effect on road safety or traffic flows on the local highways; (j) can be provided with all necessary services; (k) does not prejudice the use or development of adjoining land in accordance with the appropriate Area Plan; (l) is not on contaminated land or subject to unreasonable risk of erosion or flooding; (m) takes account of community and personal safety and security in the design of buildings and the spaces around them; and (n) is designed having due regard to best practice in reducing energy consumption. 6.3 Development outside of areas zoned for development
Environment Policy 22
Safeguarding the environment and/or the amenities of surrounding properties
Environment Policy 22: Development will not be permitted where it would unacceptably harm the environment and/or the amenity of nearby properties in terms of: i) pollution of sea, surface water or groundwater; ii) emissions of airborne pollutants; and iii) vibration, odour, noise or light pollution. 7.17.2 In addition to the above, changes in the activities associated with the current permitted use of land or a building, which in themselves do not constitute development and therefore do not require planning permission, can have an adverse impact on adjacent properties by virtue of noise, light or general disturbance. For example the addition of security lig hting on a property may cause light pollution affecting adjacent properties and the wider area. The introduction of new activities into established parks and recreation areas can have an impact on neighbours. In such cases the Department would advocate t he person or organisation considering the change to give careful consideration to the potential impact of such activity in terms of location, siting and design.
1-29 Ballamillagyhn Estate Mount Rule Douglas
similar applications that have been approved
22 - 28 Riverbank Road Ramsey
similar applications that have been approved
2-8 Ballasteen Drive, Andreas
similar applications that have been approved
Thornhill Park Ramsey
Fairways Drive, Ramsey
Claughbane Estate, Ramsey
Marlborough Crescent, Ramsey
Ballalough Estate, Andreas
Ballaterson Fields, Ballaugh
Howe Road, Onchan
Larivane Close, Andreas