Conversion, including alteration and extensions, of former hotel to nine apartments with bicycle and bin storage

promotes reuse of sites and buildings, efficient use of sites and proposals being located to utilise existing infrastructure

The proposal regenerates a long-vacant and dilapidated promenade building, reusing its existing fabric

Strategic Policy 1: Development should make the best use of resources by: (a) optimising the use of previously developed land, redundant buildings, unused and under -used land and buildings, and re - using scarce indigenous building materials; (b) ensuring efficient use of sites, taking into account the needs for access, landscaping, open space (1) and amenity standards; and (c) being located so as to utilise existing and planned infrastructure, facilities and services. 4.2.2 In pursuance of (c) abo ve, the Department will, when formulating its programme for the preparation of new Area Plans, have particular regard to: (a) the availability of mains drainage connected to IRIS or other mains systems; (b) securing the future viability of rural primary schools; (c) the public investment in the Island's highway, bus, railway and tramway networks; (d) the provision and availability of water; and (e) community facilities. 4.3 Environment 4.3.1

promote development within existing settlements

The proposal regenerates a long-vacant and dilapidated promenade building, reusing its existing fabric

Strategic Policy 2: New development will be located primarily within our existing towns and villages, or, where appropriate, in sustainable urban extensions(2) of these towns and villages. Development will be permitted in the countryside only in the exceptional circumstances identified in paragraph 6.3. (1) Open Space is defined in Appendix 1. (2) Sustainable Urban Extensions are defined in Appendix 1 4.3.2 Appendix 3 to the Plan identifies the towns and villages, and also explains why the Department has rejected the idea of a new settlement, which was mooted in the Consultation Draft published in May 2000. 4.3.3 Each of our towns and villages has an ind ividual character arising not only from its geographical position and existing fabric, but also from its historical, cultural, and social background. This character should be protected and enhanced. Accordingly:

preserve or enhance Conservation Areas

preserving the historic frontage, and enhancing the Conservation Area

Environment Policy 35: Within Conservation Areas, the Department will permit only development which would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Area, and will ensure that the special features contributing to the character and quality are protected against inappropriate development. 7.30 Development adjacent to Conservation Areas 7.30.1 It is often the case that important views into and out of a Conservation Area can contribute significantly to its character. It is necessary to assess the impact any development adjacent to conservation areas may have on such views.

supports proposals which seek to regenerate run-down urban and rural areas

The proposal regenerates a long-vacant and dilapidated promenade building

the continued regeneration within Douglas, particularly around the Promenades and Quayside and Douglas Regeneration Area to create further housing, employment, retail and leisure opportunities. Environment Policy 43 of the Strategic Plan recognises that there are some areas showing signs of deterioration and degradation, limited investment, empty and underused buildings, derelict sites and generally poor environments. It suggests that areas that could benefit from regeneration should be identified in Area Plans and any schemes or proposals whether for refurbishment, environmental improvements or complete redevelopment must be formulated by involving the local community which would be directly affected by the regeneration of the area. Re-use of sound built fabric, rather than its demolition will be encouraged. Comprehensive Treatment Area Objectives The objectives are to: i. Optimise use of land and buildings; ii. Unlock difficult sites; iii. Assist with a co-ordinated approach to development; iv. Improve the urban environment and visual amenity; v. Encourage further investment; vi. Provide for space for Douglas Town Centre to grow; and vii. Improve access and provide better linkages. Area Plan Desired Outcomes The outcomes for each identified 'treatment area' will be tied to the proposed mix of uses on each site. The desired outcomes can be summarised under the following headings - many of which are interlinked: i. Urban Design and Integration a. To provide urban design outcomes which recognise the history of each area, their relationships to neighbouring land uses and features and takes into account appropriate transition from one land use to the next. ii. Infrastructure a. General/grey - to ensure that development staging is co-ordinated with the delivery of infrastructure and to create a road network that is permeable. b. Green - to e stablish appropriate public open space assets that are visually and physically linked via the local road network and associated pedestrian and cycling trails and waterways. To protect character in terms of landscape quality and nature conservation value with settlement boundaries. iii. Uses a. Provision of retail, community services, leisure without compromising the function and role of nearby activity centres, and which facilitates efficient and direct pedestrian, cyclist and vehicle movement. iv. Making a positive contribution a. To create an attractive urban environment that features tree -lined streets and attractive open spaces with high-amenity landscaping. v. Making the best use of resources a. Areas have been chosen because of their ability to complement existing town centres uses, and to take advantage of the roads and service infrastructure already in-place. b. To ensure balance between water quality, biodiversity, recreation and visual amenity while optimising developable land within settlement limits. vi. A more integrated transport network a. Provide realistic and workable alternatives to the use of private vehicles through the creation of direct links for pedestrians, cyclists and public transport users to town centre and retail areas, to schools, leisure facilities and other community assets. Key features of Comprehensive Treatment Areas in the East The proposals set out in this Plan: • Identify four CTAs in Douglas and one in Onchan; • Have a strong treatment focus on delivering quality urban environments, with a complementary mix of land uses and clear underlying visioning; • Translate to mapped areas without defined edges; • Describe the treatment which is proposed; and • Intend the period, within which that treatment is to begin , as being within 5 years beginning with the date on which the Plan is adopted. Proposed Comprehensive Treatment Areas in the East Comprehensive Treatment Area 1 - The Villiers (area is shown on Map 5) Despite planning approval for a variety of uses having been granted, much of the site remains undeveloped and has done for some time. The site has a negative effect on this prominent area of Douglas and impacts on the appearance of the Promenade as a whole. The area fronting the Promenade should either be developed or its appearance improved by creating an attractive public space. Re -development of the wider area would not be discounted, although where existing buildings are attractive and have a sound fabric, they should be incorporated into any wider scheme. The Central Douglas Masterplan suggests there is opportunity to support the intensification of the high street through the removal of some buildings on Duke Street. The Villiers site CTA is also a strategic freight corridor and maintaining access for commercial vehicles, including HGV's, must be considered in any proposed development. CTA Proposal 1 - The Villiers (Treatment Plan) Development of this area shall include office, leisure, retail, hotel, residential, entertainment venues, food and d rink uses and public open space or a combination thereof; or the laying out of

there is value in retaining best examples of built heritage for future generations

enhancing the Conservation Area (Strategic Policy 1 & 2, Environment Policy 35 & 43, Area Plan 6.9.2)

Planning applications for the conversion of hotels in the eastern area to other uses will not normally be permitted unless it can be demonstrated that the premises do not provide a sufficient standard of accommodation and upgrading the facility would not be feasible.

Although the scheme results in the loss of a guesthouse (Area Plan Tourism Proposal 1 and Mixed Use Proposal 2)

In granting planning permission on land zoned for residential development or in predominantly residential areas the Department will normally require that 25% of provision should be made up of affordable housing. This policy will apply to developments of 8 dwellings or more.

a commuted sum in lieu of affordable housing is to be waivered given the viability evidence provided being unviable

Housing Policy 5: In granting planning permission on land zoned for residential development or in predominantly residential areas the Department will normally require that 25% of provision should be made up of affordable housing. This policy will apply to developments of 8 dwellings or more. The term affordable housing is defined by the Department as housing which is either:  directly provided by the Department; or  directly provided by Local Authorities; or  meets the criteria for the Department's House Purchase Assistance Scheme 2004 (and any successor schemes approved by Tynwald). 8.7 New Housing in Existing Settlements 8.7.1 Recent Local Plans and Area Plans have included development briefs guiding the design and layout of land which is zoned for residential use. Such briefs should not needlessly prescribe design, but should indicate site-specific constraints, the need for provision of public facilities or amenities (such as play areas, neighbourhood shops, or land for schooling, open space, or road improvements), and, if appropriate, the maximum or minimum density and the need for the inclusion of an element of affordable housing. Where these briefs state that an optimum density should be achieved this should not be used as an argument for higher density development which has an adverse effect on the residential amenity of adjoining properties or the character of the area.