Installation of a replacement window

Town and Country Planning Act 1999

the character of the Conservation Area is being preserved

he proposed level of development on the highway system. Essentially, the evidence demonstrated that the highway network could cope with the expected traffic growth up to 2026. The Strategic Links18 between the communities on the Island (the Centres referred to in the Spatial Strategy) are below. Strategic Link Roads in the East Highway Route A1 Douglas to Peel A2 Douglas to Laxey A2 Laxey to Ramsey A5 Douglas to Ballasalla A18 Douglas to Ramsey 17 Chapter 11, Isle of Man Strategic Plan 2016 18 Chapter 11, Isle of Man Strategic Plan 2016 Douglas, as the Main Centre, sits at the top of the hierarchy of service provision and is home to most of the Island's principal businesses and shops. More 'strategic links' converge on Douglas than anywhere else on the Island. The public transport network consists of buses and seasonal rail services. Lord Street currently serves as the main bus transfer hub although during the lifetime of the plan the creation of a bus station may need to be addressed. There is a short section of cycle route on Peel Road which is a strategic route i n from the South and West. Further opportunities are still under investigation and are likely to develop further alongside other measures as part of the delivery of the Active Travel Action Plan 19. The intention is to provide better and safer cycling and walking routes into and out of Douglas, better links between vehicular routes and off road routes with an overall policy goal of increasing the number of people travelling actively. The Area Plan fully supports the integration of the Active Travel Strategy into the sustainable development framework for the East. Particular Issues in the East Traffic Congestion and Road Junctions The Isle of Man Strategic Plan 2016 concluded that following junctions experience regular traffic congestion: • Quarterbridge Junction • Mountain Road/Governor's Road Junction • Glencrutchery Road/Victoria Road Junction The implications of adding the new housing units needed in the East to the road network during the plan period are set out in the Strategic Plan (see below): i. the Strategic Links are, and should, continue to operate within their 3,060 vehicles per hour capacity for the duration of the Isle of Man Strategic Plan (up to 2026); ii. the Quarterbridge and Governors Hill junctions will continue to operate at greater than 85% capacity and the increased traffic flows predicted in all the assessments will increase congestion at these locations; and iii. traffic flows at the Parliament Square junction in Ramsey, Ballacraine junction, and Main Road junction at Onchan are all set to incr ease by 2026 which will increase congestion at these locations. Outside of the East Plan area, sensitivity tests were undertaken in the Strategic Plan based on the planned level of development from 2011 to 2026. These concluded that: i. on the Ballacraine to Ramsey Strategic Link, there was no requirement to undertake further traffic congestion investigation work in rural village locations such as Kirk Michael; and ii. on the Castletown to Ballasalla and Ballasalla to Douglas links there would be the requirement for traffic congestion investigation work in Ballasalla in 2026. 19 GD 0043/18 Active Travel Strategy 2018 - 2021 From the outset of the preparation of this Plan, it has been acknowledged that the Onchan Main Road traffic signals would require further assessment. This would ensure that the junctions woul d not be subject to a high level of congestion as a resu lt of additional development. This was just one reason for carrying out detailed scenario testing work looking at different ways of spreading development across the settlements in the East. Network Capacity Issues - Roads and Utilities During the early stages of the Plan, work was undertaken to help understand both the infrastructure and environmental implications of different growth distribution patterns within the East. The servicing of Baldrine and Laxey for sewer and mains water supply were identified as matters of concern and limitation in capacity. This arises both from advice from the servicing Authority, Manx Utilities, and consideration of the public consultation respo nses. Levels of development in those two locations in terms of how they may or may not be able to be serviced and the timeframes involved were visited and re-visited throughout the plan stages and the Public Inquiry. In terms of i dentifying and addressing network capacity, new development requires water and sewer services, electricity, telecommunications and legal access connection to the road network. These are reasonable expectations of modern society and ensure a basis of healthy and connected communities for all. All sites identified can in principle be adequately serviced. Some sites will have to address specific issues set out in Development Briefs. Judgements will always be made at the planning application stage as to what

Policy 35

the character of the Conservation Area is being preserved

lew LDHP LDHP e Arbory Location Former Designation Area Plan Designation Symbol on Proposals Map (3) and Inset Maps (4-7) Parville, Ballabeg (Registered Building 235), Arbory LDHP LDHP f Balladoole House and The Granary, Arbory LDHP LDHP g Rushen Location Former Designation Area Plan Designation Symbol on Proposals Map (3) and Inset Maps (4-7) Ballagawne (Greenacres), Ballagawne Road, Rushen LDHP LDHP h Kentraugh, Rushen LDHP LDHP i Proposed Low Density Housing in Parkland An area to the East and West of Phildraw Road, Malew, as shown on Inset Map 4 Appendix 4 (a): Groups of Houses in the Countryside Survey (2009) Assessments of individual groups: (a) Cregneash: (i) Description: Cregneash comprises a group of traditional buildings clustered around the church, and set on the saddle between Meayll Hill and Cronk ny Arrey. Some of the buildings are used as part of the Cregneash Folk Museum. (ii) Assessment: It is indicated at paragraph A.3.7 of Appendix 3 to the Isle of Man Strategic Plan that "Cregneash may also be judged to have the characteris tics of a village, but as the National Folk Museum it is subject to special consideration, seeking to preserve and protect the authenticity and integrity of the village and its setting." However, it would be more accurate to refer to Cregneash as "the set ting for the National Folk Museum" rather than "the National Folk Museum ". The introduction of additional dwellings, necessarily constructed some 100 years or more later than any existing dwelling in the village, would clearly be inimical to preserving th e authenticity and integrity of the present group and its value as the setting for the Folk Museum. Additional dwellings are not therefore proposed. (b) The Howe/Glen Chass: (i) Description: The Howe comprises a group of dwellings and farm buildings ar ound the chapel on the north side of the road to The Sound. Just to the east, scattered either side of the road down to Fistard are the dwellings comprising Glen Chass. These linked groups have a sense of identity, arising in part from the chapel and in part from the topographical setting. The groups are close to Port St Mary, but clearly within the countryside. Apart from the chapel, there are no public buildings. (ii) Assessment: These groups are not in themselves sustainable settlements, and are not far enough away from Port St Mary or Port Erin to generate a valid local need for housing. In the case of The Howe, further development would be likely to extend or consolidate the existing ribbon development along The Sound Road, whilst in the case of Glen Chass, the access road is narrow and difficult, especially for public service vehicles. In these circumstances, additional dwellings are not proposed for The Howe or Glen Chass. (c) Ballakilpheric/Cronk e Dhooney: (i) Description: Grouped quite comp actly to the west and east of the still -active chapel are two collections of dwellings and farm buildings, some of which are comparatively modern. The group is some 1.5 km from the Colby main road, up a winding and sometimes narrow road. The sense of place arises largely from the chapel at the crossroads, but there are no other public facilities or amenities. (ii) Assessment: Whilst a small number of additional dwellings could be added without visual detriment to either the group or its setting, the group is not sustainable, is served by a poor access road, and is not distant enough from Colby to generate a valid local need for housing. Additional dwellings are not therefore proposed. (d) Earystane: (i) Description: Earystane comprises a collection of dwellings scattered along the road between Ballamoar and Ballacannell. The distinctive, finely coursed stonework of some of the buildings, including the former chapel, lends a sense of unity to this interesting upland settlement. The group is some 2.5 km from the main Colby Road, is served by only a narrow road, and has no public facilities or amenities. (ii) Assessment: Further dwellings would clearly not be sustainable, and would reduce the interest and attraction of the existing group. Road access is poor. Additional dwellings are not therefore proposed. (e) St Marks: (i) Description: St Marks is a designated Conservation Area, which includes some of the surrounding countryside. The buildings include the church, a chapel, the former school rooms , and a number of dwellings clustered around the village green. The spaces between the buildings contribute positively to the character of the settlement, helping to integrate it with its immediate rural environment. The undeniable sense of place arises not only from the disposition of the buildings and spaces, but also from the location at the meeting of several rural roads. (ii) Assessment: The Character Appraisal statement for the Conservation Area indicates that "Whilst new development might not be ru led out, detailed and careful assessment of any proposed develo

Planning Circular 1/98

the opening method, pattern of glazing bars and frame sections of the window is proposed to match the existing window

Planning Circular 1/98 # THE ALTERATION AND REPLACEMENT OF WINDOWS The Department of Infrastructure Planning And Building Control Division Murray House Mount Havelock Douglas Isle of Man IM1 2SF July 1998 # THE ALTERATION AND REPLACEMENT OF WINDOWS ## INTRODUCTION 1. This Planning Circular sets down the Department's policies in respect of the alteration or replacement of windows. These policies vary according to the age, merit and location of the building. For ease of use, the Circular divides buildings into several categories, and sets out the policies and reasoning for each category. ## NEED FOR PLANNING APPROVAL 2. This Circular should be read in conjunction with the recent Permitted Development Order (S.D. 664/97). The effect of the Order is that, with certain exceptions, the installation of a window in an existing aperture in a building erected after 1920 does not require planning approval. The exceptions are - a) Where the building is a registered building or in a conservation area, or in an area in respect of which the Planning Committee has passed a resolution to the effect that planning approval is required for such work; or b) Where the work would be in breach of a condition imposed on the grant of planning approval. ## GENERAL REASONING 3. The appearance of any building is strongly influenced by the detailing of its windows. The character and integrity of a building are usually best preserved by the retention and repair of the original windows, or, if this is not possible, the installation of replacements which respond suitably to the original design. In this context, "original" means those windows which were installed in the building at the time of its construction. If you are in doubt as to whether the existing windows are the originals, the staff in the Office of Planning may be able to give advice. ## BUILDING CATEGORIES 4. For the purposes of this Circular, buildings have been divided into the following categories:- a) Registered Buildings b) Buildings in Conservation Areas c) Buildings erected before 1921 and not falling within a) or b) which have largely retained their original character d) Other buildings erected before 1921 e) Buildings constructed after 1920 which do not fall into category a) or b) and which are not subject to previous planning conditions restricting the installation of replacement windows. Subsequent paragraphs of this Circular deal with each category in turn. ## Category a) REGISTERED BUILDINGS 5. Policy If the original windows are still in place they should preferably be repaired. If repair is impracticable, replacement windows MUST BE THE SAME as the originals in all respects, including the method of opening, materials and detailed design. This policy will be strictly applied other than where the particular circumstances are so exceptional as to justify a relaxation. Reasons for Policy: Registered Buildings are those buildings which are judged to be of special architectural or historic interest and which are already entered into the Protected Buildings register. Because of their special status, these buildings merit particular care and any work carried out by way of repair or alteration requires Registered Building Consent. Planning Approval and Registered Building Consent ARE ALWAYS required. Category b) BUILDINGS IN CONSERVATION AREAS 6. Policy If the original windows are in place they should preferably be repaired. If repair is impracticable, replacement windows which would be readily visible from a public thoroughfare MUST HAVE THE SAME method of opening as the originals. Whatever the material used in their construction, the windows MUST HAVE THE SAME pattern and section of glazing bars and the same frame sections as the original windows. Windows not readily visible from a public thoroughfare must have the same or similar pattern of glazing bars as the originals, but not necessarily the original method of opening, whatever the material used in the construction. Reasons for Policy: The Department has a duty to determine which parts of the Island are areas of special architectural or historic interest, the character of which it is desirable to preserve or enhance, and shall by order designate such areas as Conservation Areas. Planning Approval is required for all external works to properties in Conservation Areas to ensure that any proposals are in keeping with not only the individual building, but the special character and quality of the area as a whole. Planning Approval IS REQUIRED for alteration or replacement of window in the category of buildings. Category c) BUILDINGS ERECTED BEFORE 1921 AND NOT FALLING WITHIN CATEGORIES a) OR b) WHICH HAVE LARGELY RETAINED THEIR ORIGINAL CHARACTER 7. For ease of use, this category has been divided into two, based on the location of the building: i) Buildings in an Urban Setting

Planning Policy Statement 1/01 - Policy CA/2 (Conservation Areas)

Policy and Guidance Notes for the Conservation of the Historic Environment of the Isle of Man POLICY CA/2

POLICY CA/2 SPECIAL PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS When considering proposals for the possible development of any land or buildings which fall within the conservation area, the impact of such proposals upon the special character of the area, will be a material consideration when assessing the application. Where a development is proposed for land which, although not within the boundaries of the conservation area, would affect its context or setting, or views into or out of the area; such issues should be given special consideration where the character or appearance of a conservation area may be affected.