DEC Officer Report

Application No.: 20/00423/MCH Applicant: Mr Bo Larsen Proposal: Minor changes application for PA 19/00793/B involving amendment to window and door arrangement Site Address: Kilkenny Cottage Colooneys Lane Cooil Douglas Isle Of Man IM4 2AG Head of Development Management: Mr S Butler Recommended Decision: Permitted Date of Recommendation: _________________________________________________________________ Notes for Approval This approval relates to the amendment of the window and door arrangement to the rear corner of the kitchen, as set out on the application form date stamped as having been received 28.04.20

Plans/Drawings/Information; This approval relates to the application form and plans 19/2767/01, 19/2767/02 and 19/2767/03C date stamped as having been received 28.04.20 _____________________________________________________________________________ Officer’s Report

|Requirement|Source|Analysis|Pass| |---|---|---|---| |Basis of Application|Basis of Application|Basis of Application|Basis of Application| |Only one minor changes application may be made in respect of any particular grant of planning approval.|21(1)|No previous|Yes| |Must relate to a grant of planning approval in respect of a building|21/2)(a)|Parent approval for alterations for house|Yes| |Must specify what minor changes are being sought and why the applicant considers them to be of a minor nature|21(2)(b)|Set out on application form – replacement of window with door. Plans also highlight removal and re-installation of burner and flue, which is not|Yes|

| | |sought approval for and so not considered (although arguably could be seen as repair work or de minimis)| | |---|---|---|---| |Cannot increase the number of dwellings or buildings for which planning approval has been granted|21(2)(c)(i)|No concerns|Yes| |Cannot increase the net external footprint of a building for which planning approval has been granted|21(2)(c)(ii)|No increase|Yes| |Cannot alter the site for which planning approval has been granted and which was defined by a red line on the site location map by changing that line|21(2)(c)(iii)|No change|Yes| |Cannot make material changes to the vehicular access arrangements for which planning approval has been granted|21(2)(c)(iv)|No change|Yes| |Cannot alter the conditions (if any) which have been imposed|21(2)(c)(v)|No conditions on parent approval (other than 4 year)|Yes| |Cannot be made where the parent approval is less than 21 days old, subject to an undetermined appeal or has expired|21(2)(d)|No concerns|Yes| |Requirement|Source|Analysis|Pass| |Application Content|Application Content|Application Content|Application Content| |Application Form|22(3)(a)|Provided|Yes| |Information in Schedule 1:<br><br> Site location plan (including flood risk assessment)<br> The planning approval that is the subject of the application<br> The changes to that approval which are being applied for<br> An explanation as to why those changes are being applied for;<br> (if relevant) the site plan, and the plans, elevations and sections of the proposed buildings and structures amended to indicate the changes.<br>|22(3)(a&c)|Provided|Yes| |Document specified on form but not in Schedule 1|22(3)(b)|Provided|Yes| |Fee|22(3)(4)|Provided|Yes| |Such further info as Department may request prior to determination|22(6)|N/A|Yes| |Requirement|Source|Analysis|Pass| |Determination|Determination|Determination|Determination| |Must not significantly increase the size or scale of the development in question|23(1)(a)|No concerns|Yes| |Must not significantly change the nature of the development in question|23(1)(b)|No concerns|Yes| |Requirement|Source|Analysis|Pass|

|Must not result in an approval which, at the time of approval, complied with a Development Plan, National Policy Directive or a Planning Policy Statement, ceasing to do so|23(1)(c)|No concerns|Yes| |---|---|---|---| |Must not result in new or increased adverse impacts on adjoining or neighbouring properties having a significant or disproportionate impact on the environment (irrespective of whether such impacts might be outweighed by other considerations)|23(1)(d)|No concerns – especially noting context of site|Yes| |Must not be more than minor and to be of a magnitude to warrant a new application|23(1)(e)|No concerns|Yes| |Must not otherwise fundamentally change the basis on which the grant was originally made.|23(1)(e)|No concerns|Yes| |If it does not do any of the above, must then be considered. – is the application considered acceptable?|23(2)|No unacceptable or materially different impacts visually or on neighbouring property amenity|Yes| |Notice of Decision|Notice of Decision|Notice of Decision|Notice of Decision| |Set out whether all, some or no changes are accepted (And which is which)|24(2)(a)|Replacement of window with door as set out on form|Replacement of window with door as set out on form| |For any elements refused, the reasons for that.|24(2)(b)|No applied for elements as set out on the form are refused|No applied for elements as set out on the form are refused|

See on-line _____________________________________________________________________

I can confirm that this decision has been made by the Director of Planning and Building Control in accordance with the authority afforded to that Officer by the appropriate DEFA Delegation.

Decision Made : Permitted Date : 17/7/20 Determining officer Signed : J CHANCE Jennifer Chance Director of Planning and Building Control

Customer note

This copy of the officer report reflects the content of the assessment and has been produced in this form for the benefit of our online services/customers and archive records.