The proposal has the potential to remove these inappropriate buildings from the site, and to replace them with a more appropriate new dwelling.
The principle of a residential use of site A is acceptable.
Impact on Visual amenities of the RBs
The applicant has indicated that the proposed new dwelling would be in keeping with the adjacent properties.
It is indicated that the RB curtilage includes the land around both 'Old School House' and 'St Stephens Church \& Hall'.
The notice of proposals to 'Register a Building' it included the 'St Stephens Church and former School together with the curtilages.
However, the attached plan and the subsequent RB approval (24th April 1998) did not include the curtilage of the site.
Accordingly, the RB documents only include the buildings themselves and do not include the land around or any parts of the application sites.
RBC is therefore not required now or in the future for any proposed developments within the curtilages of the RBs.
It is still necessary to consider the potential impact upon the RBs and the character and quality of the setting around them.
It is key that any dwelling should be in keeping with the character, appearance and finish of the St Stephens Church \& Hall.
This can be achieved for example by a new building matching the RB in terms of proportion, design, finish and form.
This could result in public views making it appear as an 'extension' to St Stephens Church \& Hall rather than a totally separate dwelling.
Other design options would also be available.
The Reserved Matters application would need to demonstrate that any chosen design did not adversely effect the character and quality of the RBs.
If the design was unacceptable and detrimental to the RBs, PBCD would still be in a position to refuse the proposal.
A dwelling on this site could be designed to take account of the existing RBs without adversely affecting their character and appearance.
Impact on character and appearance of the street scene
A dwelling could be erected on the site which would be of benefit to the character and appearance of the street scene.
The five trees along the road side frontage have a tree felling license and have been removed.
This has been beneficial, given that they screened Old School House.
Their removal opens up the area fronting the building and results in the building being more apparent.
The surrounding area is characterised by much larger mature trees.
The loss of the frontage trees has not had a detrimental impact on the visual amenities of the street scene.
Highway issues and parking provision
Both the new dwelling and the existing dwelling provide two off road parking spaces with adequate turning provision.
Accordingly, the proposal causes no concern in relation to these points.
Submitted drawings indicate visibility splays of $2 \mathrm{~m} \times 54 \mathrm{~m}$ in both directions and $2.4 \mathrm{~m} \times 54 \mathrm{~m}$ in both directions.
The plans indicate that visibility in an easterly direction can be achieved, albeit that it does go over land outside the applicant's control.
This can normally cause concern as a condition attached requiring ' $X$ ' visibility needs to be achieved and retained.
If the applicants do not control the land, there is the risk that the owner could plant landscaping which blocks visibility.
This is unlikely to occur. The frontage is made up of a wall no higher than 1.05 m and the area provides visibility for the users of the church and hall.
If the church planted or allowed landscaping to grow above 1.05 metres in height, they would affect their own visibility.
This will improve visibility for the users of St Stephens Church Hall in a westerly direction, beneficial to all.
Lowering of the pillars (separate pedestrian and vehicular accesses) fronting the Old School House, will also ensure visibility is achieved.
It is considered these would be more in keeping, given the height of some of the church pillars are lower.
The character of the pillars would be retained whilst still providing visibility.
The hedgerow which ran along the frontage of the original Old School House has been removed.
Overall, it is considered the access arrangement would be acceptable and therefore that the proposal complies with GP2 of the IOMSP.
2. Appeal B: Site B
Principle of Development
The applicant has indicated that the proposed new dwelling would be in keeping with the adjacent properties.
The site is designated for residential development; therefore the principle of residential development is acceptable.
Impact on Visual amenities of RBs
See above re RB curtilage(s) and 'Notice of Proposal to Register a Building'.
Any dwelling should be in keeping with the character, appearance and finish of the Old School House which is a RB.
A traditional dwelling of either similar or identical form to the former school house would again be appropriate on this site.
Any detailed design will need to consider the proportion, form, siting, size and finishes and ideally should replicate all aspects of the original RB.
The external finishes should be in Manx stone, especially the front elevation, with brick detailing and the roof should be finished in natural slate.
The windows are considered an important feature of the dwelling and again should replicate the windows of the former school house.
All deigns matters should also be incorporated into any detailed design. Such matters could be added as conditions to any approval.
Potential impact on character of street scene
An appropriately designed dwelling could be erected which would be of benefit to the character and appearance of the street scene.
See Appeal A Site A above regarding tree removal.
Highway issues and Parking
In terms of parking provision the new dwelling and the existing dwelling both require two off road parking spaces associated with each property.
This can easily be achieved on the site, with both having adequate turning provision to enable any vehicle to exit onto Main Road in a forwards gear.
Accordingly, the proposal from this respect causes no concern.
Copyright in submitted documents remains with their authors. Request removal
Source & Provenance
Official reference
19/00087/B
Source authority
Isle of Man Government Planning & Building Control