The proposal has the potential to remove these inappropriate buildings from the site, and to replace them with a more appropriate new dwelling. - The principle of a residential use of site A is acceptable. Impact on Visual amenities of the RBs - The applicant has indicated that the proposed new dwelling would be in keeping with the adjacent properties. - It is indicated that the RB curtilage includes the land around both 'Old School House' and 'St Stephens Church \& Hall'. - The notice of proposals to 'Register a Building' it included the 'St Stephens Church and former School together with the curtilages. - However, the attached plan and the subsequent RB approval (24th April 1998) did not include the curtilage of the site. - Accordingly, the RB documents only include the buildings themselves and do not include the land around or any parts of the application sites. - RBC is therefore not required now or in the future for any proposed developments within the curtilages of the RBs. - It is still necessary to consider the potential impact upon the RBs and the character and quality of the setting around them. - It is key that any dwelling should be in keeping with the character, appearance and finish of the St Stephens Church \& Hall. - This can be achieved for example by a new building matching the RB in terms of proportion, design, finish and form. - This could result in public views making it appear as an 'extension' to St Stephens Church \& Hall rather than a totally separate dwelling. - Other design options would also be available. - The Reserved Matters application would need to demonstrate that any chosen design did not adversely effect the character and quality of the RBs. - If the design was unacceptable and detrimental to the RBs, PBCD would still be in a position to refuse the proposal. - A dwelling on this site could be designed to take account of the existing RBs without adversely affecting their character and appearance. Impact on character and appearance of the street scene - A dwelling could be erected on the site which would be of benefit to the character and appearance of the street scene. - The five trees along the road side frontage have a tree felling license and have been removed. - This has been beneficial, given that they screened Old School House. - Their removal opens up the area fronting the building and results in the building being more apparent. - The surrounding area is characterised by much larger mature trees. - The loss of the frontage trees has not had a detrimental impact on the visual amenities of the street scene. ## Highway issues and parking provision - Both the new dwelling and the existing dwelling provide two off road parking spaces with adequate turning provision. - Accordingly, the proposal causes no concern in relation to these points. - Submitted drawings indicate visibility splays of in both directions and in both directions. - The plans indicate that visibility in an easterly direction can be achieved. albeit that it does go over land outside the applicant's control. - The proposal has the potential to remove these inappropriate buildings from the site, and to replace them with a more appropriate new dwelling. - The principle of a residential use of site A is acceptable. ## Impact on Visual amenities of the RBs - The applicant has indicated that the proposed new dwelling would be in keeping with the adjacent properties. - It is indicated that the RB curtilage includes the land around both 'Old School House' and 'St Stephens Church \& Hall'. - The notice of proposals to 'Register a Building' it included the 'St Stephens Church and former School together with the curtilages. - However, the attached plan and the subsequent RB approval (24th April 1998) did not include the curtilage of the site. - Accordingly, the RB documents only include the buildings themselves and do not include the land around or any parts of the application sites. - RBC is therefore not required now or in the future for any proposed developments within the curtilages of the RBs. - It is still necessary to consider the potential impact upon the RBs and the character and quality of the setting around them. - It is key that any dwelling should be in keeping with the character, appearance and finish of the St Stephens Church \& Hall. - This can be achieved for example by a new building matching the RB in terms of proportion, design, finish and form. - This could result in public views making it appear as an 'extension' to St Stephens Church \& Hall rather than a totally separate dwelling. - Other design options would also be available. - The Reserved Matters application would need to demonstrate that any chosen design did not adversely effect the character and quality of the RBs. - If the design was unacceptable and detrimental to the RBs, PBCD would still be in a position to refuse the proposal. - A dwelling on this site could be designed to take account of the existing RBs without adversely affecting their character and appearance. Impact on character and appearance of the street scene - A dwelling could be erected on the site which would be of benefit to the character and appearance of the street scene. - The five trees along the road side frontage have a tree felling, license and have been removed. - This has been beneficial, given that they screened Old School House. - Their removal opens up the area fronting the building and results in the building being more apparent. - The surrounding area is characterised by much larger mature trees. - The loss of the frontage trees has not had a detrimental impact on the visual amenities of the street scene. ### Highway issues and parking provision - Both the new dwelling and the existing dwelling provide two off road parking spaces with adequate turning provision. - Accordingly, the proposal causes no concern in relation to these points. - Submitted drawings indicate visibility splays of in both directions and in both directions. - The plans indicate that visibility in an easterly direction can be achieved. albeit that it does go over land outside the applicant's control.
Copyright in submitted documents remains with their authors. Request removal
Source & Provenance
Official reference
19/00087/B
Source authority
Isle of Man Government Planning & Building Control