Loading document...
Application No.: 22/00451/GB Applicant: Mr Miles Pettit & Miss Phillippa Gale Proposal: Alterations, erection of ground floor extension and installation of replacement windows (in association with 22/00452/CON) Site Address: 5 Victoria Terrace Douglas Isle Of Man IM2 4EU Registered Buildings Officer: Mr Ross Brazier Expected Decision Level: Officer Delegation Recommended Decision: Permitted Date of Recommendation: 24.05.2022
C : Conditions for approval N : Notes attached to conditions
Reason: To comply with Article 26 of the Town and Country Planning (Development Procedure) Order 2019 and to avoid the accumulation of unimplemented planning approvals.
The proposals are considered to be in accordance with the Strategic Plan policies GP2 and 4, Paragraph 9.5.8 and Business Policy 13 , Policies RB/3 AND RB/5 of Planning Policy Statement 1/01 and is judged to be acceptable.
Plans/Drawings/Information; This decision relates to the following:
_______________________________________________________________ Interested Person Status – Additional Persons None _____________________________________________________________________________ Officer’s Report THE SITE
1.1 The site (no 5) forms part of the Registered Building Victoria Terrace (RB 187) which is a row of six pairs of semi-detached houses. Designed in a neo classical style by John Robinson in 1843 the pairs have twin front doors set in shared pedimented porches that are faced directly on to the pavement. The buildings have hipped roofs with deep eaves their interlocking side entrance pillars and railings along with the varied later side additions give the impression the buildings forming a single terrace. The properties are slow the contour of the road and are stepped in pairs to reflect this, which gives rise to some of the properties having half and full basements and others not. The Buildings have long gardens which run through to the rear access lane Victoria Place, with some of the properties having garages or sheds others
2.1 The proposals seek planning approval for extensions to rear elevation (kitchen) and side (south) and replacement windows (in association with 22/00451/GB).
3.1 TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1999 S16 Registered buildings: supplementary provisions
(3) In considering —
3.2 National policy: THE ISLE OF MAN STRATEGIC PLAN 2016 Strategic Policy 4: Proposals for development must:
General Policy 2: Development which is in accordance with the land-use zoning and proposals in the appropriate Area Plan and with other policies of this Strategic Plan will normally be permitted, provided that the development:
Environment Policy 32: Extensions or alterations to a Registered Building which would affect detrimentally its character as a building of special architectural or historic interest will not be permitted.
Environment Policy 34: In the maintenance, alteration or extension of pre-1920 buildings, the use of traditional materials will be preferred.
3.3 Planning Policy Statements: 1/01 Policy and Guidance Notes for the Conservation of the Historic Environment of the Isle of Man
POLICY RB/3 General criteria applied in considering registered building applications The issues that are generally relevant to the consideration of all registered building applications are:-
POLICY RB/5 ALTERATIONS AND EXTENSIONS In considering whether to grant planning approval for development which affects a registered building or its setting and in considering whether to grant registered building consent for any works, the Department shall have special regard to the desirability of preserving the building or its setting or any features of special architectural or historic interest which it possesses.
Registered building consent is required for the building's alteration in any way which would affect its special architectural or historic character. There will be a general presumption against alteration or extension of registered buildings, except where a convincing case can be made, against the criteria set out in this section, for such proposals.
Applicants for registered building consent for alteration or extension to a registered building must be able to justify their proposals. They will be required to show why the works which would affect the character of the registered building are desirable or necessary and they should provide full information to enable the Department to assess the likely impact of their proposals on the special architectural or historic interest of the building and on its setting. Where registered buildings are the subject of successive applications for alteration or extension, consideration will also be given to the cumulative effect upon the building's special interest as a result of several minor works which may individually seem of little consequence.
4.1 The site has been subject of a number of applications since being registered those considered of note to this case are the following; Reference Number: 05/01023/GB Status: Permitted Proposal: Renovation of a registered building including reconstruction of an existing two storey extension and construction of a new glazed atrium (in association with 05/01023CON) Reference Number: 05/01023/CON Status: Permitted Proposal: Renovation of a registered building including reconstruction of an existing two storey extension and construction of a new glazed atrium (in association with 05/01023GB) REPRESENTATIONS
Copies of representations received can be viewed on the government's website. This report contains summaries only.
5.1 Douglas Borough Council raised no objection to the application (22.4.22)
5.2 Highways Services indicated there is no highway interest in the application (26.04.22)
5.5 Manx National Heritage (MNH) were consulted (11.04.22) but provided no comments.
6.1 The issues in this case are whether the proposed alterations to the building will preserve the registered building or its setting or any features of special architectural or historic
interest which it possesses and whether the proposals will impact upon the amenity of local residents or the character of the locality.
6.2 Two additions are proposed to the rear of the property, one to the rear of the side extension to create a boot room, the other to the rear of the main house to create a sun/garden room accessed via the kitchen. The additions are linked but their massing is stepped down and so read as two elements.
6.3 The proposed massing of the new additions are relatively modest in terms of increase in footprint, they enable the original building line of the property to be still read and understood and is considered to be subservient to it. The design of the proposed additions is conservative using detailing of the building in its design and the materiality is also replicating that of the principal building which is considered to be a sensitive approach. Whist the front of the terrace has a strong building line, it is considered that this is not as significant at the rear of these properties, being broken up by garden walls and extensive rear gardens. It is considered that a justification has been put forward by the applicant and that the proposals will not cause harm to the character or special interest of the building and will therefore preserve it.
6.4 It is considered due to the design, scale and massing of the proposed extensions that they will not result in any impact on the amenity of local residents and will not result in an unacceptable level of overlooking to the neighbouring properties. CONCLUSION - 7.1 The proposals are considered to be beneficial to the building helping to preserve it and will have no impact upon the character or appearance of the conservation area does not affect adversely the amenity of local residents or the character of the locality or and to be in accordance with the Strategic Plan policies, Policies RB/3, RB/5, CA/2 of Planning Policy Statement 1/01 and is supported.
8.1 By virtue of the Town and Country Planning (Development Procedure) Order 2019, the following persons are automatically interested persons:
8.2 In addition to those above, the Regulation 9(3) requires the Department to decide which persons (if any) who have made representations with respect to the application, should be treated as having sufficient interest in the subject matter of the application to take part in any subsequent proceedings relating to the application.
I can confirm that this decision has been made by a Principal Planner in accordance with the authority afforded to that Officer by the appropriate DEFA Delegation and that in making this
decision the Officer has agreed the recommendation in relation to who should be afforded Interested Person Status.
Decision Made : Permitted Date: 25.05.2022 Determining officer Signed : J SINGLETON Jason Singleton Principal Planner
Customer note This copy of the officer report reflects the content of the file copy and has been produced in this form for the benefit of our online services/ customers and archive records.
Copyright in submitted documents remains with their authors. Request removal