Loading document...
Application No.: 15/00713/B Applicant: Mr Arthur McHenry Proposal: Demolition of existing building containing two flats and erection of two semi-detached dwellings Site Address: Land at Cliff Cottage Larch Hill Grove Tromode Douglas Isle of Man IM4 4QB Case Officer : Mr Chris Balmer Photo Taken: 08.07.2015 Site Visit: 08.07.2015 Expected Decision Level: Officer Delegation
1.0 THE APPLICATION SITE - 1.1 The application site is land at Cliff Cottage, Larch Hill Grove, Tromode which is a parcel of land which includes a detached two storey dwelling along the western side of Larch Hill Grove.
2.0 PROPOSAL - 2.1 The application seeks approval for the demolition of existing building containing two flats and erection of two semi-detached dwellings. The proposed dwelling would have a combined width of 14.4 metres, a depth of 10.7 metres and a maximum height of 11.4 metres (west elevation). The dwellings are split level due to the topography of the site, with the front elevation appearing two storey when view from Larch Hill Grove and three storey to the rear.
3.0 PLANNING HISTORY - 3.1 The application site has been the subject of two previous planning application that could be considered material to the assessment of this current planning application: - 3.2 Approval in principle for the erection of two detached dwellings to replace existing building 10/01457/A - APPROVED - 3.3 Planning application 10/01183/A sought approval in principle for the erection of three dwellings to replace the existing building on the same application site as the current planning application. This previous planning application was withdrawn by the applicant before any decision was made.
4.0 REPRESENTATIONS - 4.1 Onchan District Commissioners recommend that the planning application be approved (received on 27.01.16 Approved amended plans & 15.07.15 original plans) - 4.2 The Department of Infrastructure Highways Services do not oppose the planning application (received on 27.01.2016). - 4.3 The owners/occupants of 19 Larch Hill Grove, Tromode, Onchan have objected to the application (original scheme only received on 05.07.2015) which can be summarised as; loss of light during afternoon / evening sun through the rear windows of our property and over our back garden and deck; our back garden and deck / kitchen will be overlooked by the new property, given its
positioning and the location of the window at the side; and you will note from your site inspections that none of the other properties in the area have windows to the side, affording a certain degree of privacy to each home, which is particularly important given the dwellings' close proximity to each other. The proposed frosting on the glass does not allay my concerns in this regard.
5.0 PLANNING POLICY - 5.1 In terms of local plan policy, the application site is within an area recognised as being within predominantly residential use under the Isle of Man Planning Scheme (Onchan Local Plan) Order 2000 Map No. 2. Policy O/RES/P/19 of Planning Circular 1/2000 (the written statement to read in conjunction with the local plan) states: "The erection of new residential properties may be permitted within areas designated for residential use where these would fit in with the density, massing, design and character of existing adjacent dwellings." - 5.2 In terms of strategic plan policy, the Isle of Man Strategic Plan 2007 contains the following policies that are considered specifically material to the assessment of this current planning application: - 5.3 Strategic Policy 1 states: "Development should make the best use of resources by:
5.4 General Policy 2 states: "Development which is in accordance with the land-use zoning and proposals in the appropriate Area Plan and with other policies of this Strategic Plan will normally be permitted, provided that the development:
5.5 Environment Policy 42 states: "New development in existing settlements must be designed to take account of the particular character and identity, in terms of buildings and landscape features of the immediate locality. Inappropriate backland development, and the removal of open or green spaces which contribute to the visual amenity and sense of place of a particular area will not be permitted. Those open or green spaces which are to be preserved will be identified in Area Plans."
5.6 Transport Policy 7 states: "The Department will require that in all new development, parking provision must be in accordance with the Department's current standards."
6.0 ASSESSMENT - 6.1 The principal issues to consider in the assessment of the application are; the principle of developing the site for two dwellings; the impact upon the character and appearance of the street scene; the potential impact upon neighbouring amenities; and amenities for future occupants of the new dwellings. THE PRINCIPLE OF DEVELOPING THE SITE FOR TWO DWELLINGS - 6.2 The site is designated for residential development under the Onchan Local plan; there is an existing dwelling which the applicants indicates was converted into two flats on the site, and the previous application (PA 10/01457/A - now expired) accepted two dwellings in principle could be accommodated within the site. Due to these three reasons it is considered the principle of developing the site for two dwellings is considered acceptable. However, this is not an automatic reason to approve this current application, as the further issues raised in paragraph 6.1 of this report need to be considered. THE IMPACT UPON THE CHARACTER AND APPEARANCE OF THE STREET SCENE - 6.3 The application lies between two differing phases of development, according, the dwelling to either side, whilst both two storey to the front elevation, do differ in design and types of finishes, albeit some are similar with brick and render. - 6.4 The proposal would again add a slight different design, albeit similar in style and finish. The main difference of the proposals would also be a hipped roof design which differs to the gable ended properties in the area. The proposal does also include two projecting, two storey gables to the front elevation which draws similarities to the existing properties in the street scene. The proposals would also be set back from the two neighbouring properties Nrs 17 and Nr 19. Overall, whilst the proposals are different to the existing properties, it is considered the differences are not so great which would cause a significant harm to the character of the street scene to warrant a refusal. - 6.5 It should be noted that the proposal would result in the removing of the mature tree to the front of the site. This has been discussed with the Forestry Directorate who has no objection. It was noted that there are existing trees in the area; particularly opposite the site, on the other side of the estate road, and therefore the removal of this tree would not significantly affect the appearance of the area. THE POTENTIAL IMPACT UPON NEIGHBOURING AMENITIES - 6.6 The original scheme which was submitted proposed similar dwellings, but set further back into the site. This causes concerns of the neighbouring residents (Nr 19) and also concerns of the Planning Directorate, namely through loss of light due to the proposed siting and height of the proposal. - 6.7 Following this, discussions where had between the applicants and the planning directorate, where it was agreed that moving the dwelling further forward would be beneficial to neighbouring amenities. - 6.8 Accordingly, given the dwellings new position in relation to the neighbouring property; namely Nr 19, it is considered the proposal would not have a significant impact upon the amenities through loss of light of this property to warrant a refusal. Light would be lost, but this would be mainly to the gable elevation (no windows within) of Nr 19 and the parking area. The windows within the gable elevation of the proposed dwelling would be small, obscure glazed and serve landing windows (i.e. non- primary habitable rooms) and therefore it is not considered there would be any significant level of overlooking and/or the perception of being overlooked to warrant a refusal. In terms of the proposals having an overbearing impact upon outlooks from Nr 19, again
7.0 RECOMMENDATION - 7.1 Based on the above assessment it is concluded that the two dwellings are acceptable and comply with the relevant planning policies within the Isle of Man Strategic Plan and the Onchan Local Plan. It is therefore recommended that the planning application be approved.
8.0 PARTY STATUS - 8.1 By virtue of the Town and Country Planning (Development Procedure) (No 2) Order 2013 as modified by the Transfer of Planning and Building Control Functions Order 2015, the following persons are automatically interested persons:
With effect from 1 June 2015, the Transfer of Planning & Building Control Functions Order 2015 amends the Town and Country Planning Act 1999 to give effect to the meaning of the word 'Department' to be the Department of Environment, Food and Agriculture unless otherwise directed by that Order.
8.2 In line with Article 6(3) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Procedure)(No2) Order 2013 and paragraph 2(1) of Government Circular No. 01/13, the following persons who have made representation to the planning application are considered to have sufficient interest in the subject matter of the application to take part in any subsequent proceedings relating to the application: The owners/occupants of 19 Larch Hill Grove, Tromode, Onchan
Recommendation Recommended Decision: Permitted
Date of Recommendation: 17.02.2016
Reason: To comply with article 14 of the Town and Country Planning (Development Procedure) (No2) Order 2013 and to avoid the accumulation of unimplemented planning approvals.
Reason: To ensure that sufficient provision is made for off-street parking and turning of vehicles in the interests of highway safety.
debris and trenching, with the existing ground levels maintained, and there shall be no entry to those areas except for approved arboricultural or landscape works.
Reason: To safeguard the areas to be landscaped and the existing trees and planting to be retained within the site.
This approval relates to drawings reference numbers 100A, 101, 01, 201B and 202A received on 25th June 2015 and 15th January 2016.
I can confirm that this decision has been made by the Head of Development Management in accordance with the authority afforded to that Officer by the appropriate DEFA Delegation.
Decision Made : Permitted Date : 24.02.2016 Determining officer
Signed : J CHANCE Jennifer Chance Head of Development Management
Copyright in submitted documents remains with their authors. Request removal