10 January 2011 · Delegated
Field 521895, Between Isle Of Man Business Park And, Cooil Road, Douglas, Isle Of Man, IM2 2qa
Permission was granted for the erection of a business headquarters building on a currently undeveloped parcel of land within the Isle of Man Business Park in Braddan. The building was proposed to include office space, warehousing and storage, and display and demonstration space, along with associated car parking, drainage works, and landscaping. The site measures approximately 0.17 hectares and is accessed via a new estate road into the existing business park, sitting adjacent to Cooil Road. The application had a related planning history reference on file. The decision was made on 10 January 2011 by the Senior Planning Officer under delegated authority, with three conditions attached to the approval.
The application was approved by the Senior Planning Officer under delegated authority. The proposal was for a business headquarters building on an undeveloped plot within the Isle of Man Business Park, and permission was granted with three conditions attached.
Development which is in accordance with the land-use zoning and proposals in the appropriate Area Plan and with other policies of this Strategic Plan will normally be permitted
General Policy 2: Development which is in accordance with the land-use zoning and proposals in the appropriate Area Plan and with other policies of this Strategic Plan will normally be permitted, provided that the development: (a) is in accordance with the design brief in the Area Plan where there is such a brief; (b) respects the site and surroundings in terms of the siting, layout, scale, form, design and landscaping of buildings and the spaces around them; (c) does not affect adversely the character of the surrounding landscape or townscape; (d) does not adversely affect the protected wildlife or locally important habitats on the site or adjacent land, including water courses; (e) does not affect adversely public views of the sea; (f) incorporates where possible existing topography and landscape features, particularly trees and sod banks; (g) does not affect adversely the amenity of local residents or the character of the locality; (h) provides satisfactory amenity standards in itself, including where appropriate safe and convenient access for all highway users, together with adequate parking, servicing and manoeuvring space; (i) does not have an unacceptable effect on road safety or traffic flows on the local highways; (j) can be provided with all necessary services; (k) does not prejudice the use or development of adjoining land in accordance with the appropriate Area Plan; (l) is not on contaminated land or subject to unreasonable risk of erosion or flooding; (m) takes account of community and personal safety and security in the design of buildings and the spaces around them; and (n) is designed having due regard to best practice in reducing energy consumption. 6.3 Development outside of areas zoned for development
New office buildings should, in terms of height and mass, respect the scale and character of adjoining and nearby buildings
Business Policy 8: New office buildings should, in terms of height and mass, respect the scale and character of adjoining and nearby buildings and should accommodate parking space in accordance with the standards specified in Appendix 7 of the Plan. 9.4 Retailing 9.4.1 As with office accommodation, and for similar reasons, retailing is largely concentrated in our town and village centres. Of these, Douglas is the largest and includes branches of many of the shops which are familiarly found in high streets around the UK. However, locally based retailers add variety and interest to our shopping streets, and this is particularly noticeable in Ramsey, Peel, and Castletown. It is interesting to note that in Ramsey and Peel, locally based furniture shops operate successfully from within the town centres, whereas Douglas town centre has now largely lost its furniture shops to edge-of-town or out-of-town sites. 9.4.2 The reasons for directing retail development to town centre sites are essentially those set out in paragraph 9.3.3 in respect of offices, but to these must be added the nee d for there to be a sufficient range and choice of goods available in the one shopping trip, without the need to travel between sites. Experience in the UK illustrates the impact which out -of-town retail development has on the traditional town centre high street and on small village shops, and it is pertinent to note the reversal of policy by the UK Government. The Department therefore proposes to adhere to the established policy which was embodied in the Tynwald resolution of 1987 (see paragraph 9.2.5). 9.4.3 Exceptions to this general policy have been identified in paragraph 9.2.6. In addition, there are community benefits associated with neighbourhood shops (see paragraph 10.6.1). The following general policy is therefore appropriate:
parking provision must be in accordance with the Department's current standards
Transport Policy 7: The Department will require that in all new development, parking provision must be in accordance with the Department's current standards. The current standards are set out in Appendix 7. 11.5.4 New development can have a significant impact in terms of the traffic generated by it and the impact on the various modes of travel. The Department considers that proposals which are likely to be significant traffic generators should be accompanied by a Transport Assessment(1) which should look at all modes of transport including access by public transport, cycling and on foot.
major development to be accompanied by a Transport Assessment
Transport Policy 8: The Department will require all applications for major development to be accompanied by a Transport Assessment. 11.6 Airports and Airfields 11.6.1 Whilst it is acknowledged that airport development in general will be necessary in order to serve the economic and recreational needs of the Island, such need should be balanced against the environmental consequences that development may have, in particular visual, traffic, and noise impacts. 11.6.2 The aim of the Department of Transport Airports Division is "to ensure that sufficient operating capacity is provided to meet present and anticipated demand, so that the travelling public have the facilities and service they require." The Ronaldsway Airport Master Plan published by the Department of Transport in April 2000 anticipates that the Airp ort will require increasing levels of space in order to satisfy a projected Island economic growth rate of 4% p.a. and to operate efficiently in the future. The Master Plan indicates that space is likely to be required for uses such as hangar/engineering development, apron extension, and car parking. In 2006, planning permission was granted for Runway End Safety Areas (RESA)/runway extension and, at the time of writing, was the subject of an appeal. The Department of Transport updated the Airport Master Pl an in 2006. This indicates that any new or extended facilities required by growth in air traffic and/or passenger numbers for the low and high forecasts including in the Master Plan can be accommodated within the existing perimeter of the airport. Accord ingly, while the Spatial Strategy identifies the Gateway role of the Airport there do not appear to be any strategic land use implications from the Master Plan. The recent announcement by the Department of Transport to provide a by-pass to the East of Bal lasalla will resolve current problems within the village; improve access to the Airport from Douglas; and address any traffic generated by growth in the use of the airport. 11.6.3 The operation of the Airport in a safe and efficient manner also depends u pon the safeguarding of approach and departure routes to ensure that new development does not represent an undue risk to air travellers or those on the ground. Policies and guidance in respect of the location, size, and form of new development in the vicin ity of Ronaldsway Airport should be included in the area plan covering Castletown and Malew. Associated with the principal Runway 08, extending south -west over Castletown is the Public Safety Zone (PSZ). While the area covered by the PSZ has been reduced twice in the past 20 years in response to increased aviation safety it remains the case that this is the area within which there is statistically a higher risk of an aircraft accident. It is therefore proper practice that, within the PSZ, planning permiss ion should not be granted for any development proposal which is likely to increase significantly the number of persons residing, working, or congregating within the zone. The DoT (Airports Division) should be consulted in relation to development in this ar ea. This area will be incorporated into the new Area Plan for the South. 11.6.4 Jurby Airfield is vested in the Department of Transport but is not licensed, with responsibility for the co -ordination of all activities - whether or not aviation -related - delegated to the Department of Tourism and Leisure. Whilst aviation activity at the airfield is generally limited (1) Transport Assessment is defined in Appendix 1 to lightweight aircraft and occasional military and display uses and there is no current plan to develop Jurby Airfield for other aviation purpo ses, it is the Department of Transport's policy to continue to safeguard the main runway for future emergency and general aviation use only. Andreas Airfield is private and unregistered. It is used for general aviation and by a flying club and as an emer gency landing strip when Ronaldsway is fogbound. Future growth of aviation may require other aviation sites. Should this prove to be the case they will need to be assessed against the environmental policies of the Plan. Any other airfields on the Island are privately owned and unlicensed, and whilst they may not be subject to formal safeguarding requirements the impact of new development on the use of such facilities should be carefully considered.
Condition 1
The development hereby permitted shall commence before the expiration of four years from the date of this notice.
Condition 2
This approval relates to drawing no.s APL1 rev. A, APL/02 rev. A, APL/03 rev. A and APL4 rev. A stamped the 11th November 2010.
Condition 3
Prior to the occupation of the building the car parking provision must be set out and capable of use in accordance with drawing no. APL1 rev. A date stamped the 11th November 2010.
