19 October 2018 · Delegated
Mitre Cottage, Main Road, Kirk Michael, Isle Of Man, IM6 1ah
Permission was granted for Olivier Rose Hair And Beauty Ltd to change the use of The Old Post Office on Main Road, Kirk Michael from an estate agents to a hair and beauty salon. The site is a traditional property, described in the officer's report as appearing to have once been residential, with an extension, set behind the main street. The application was decided by the Head of Development Management under delegated authority. The officer recommended approval and the decision was issued on 19 October 2018, with one condition attached.
The application was approved by the Head of Development Management under delegated authority. Permission was granted to change the use of the property from an estate agents to a hair and beauty salon. The officer recommended approval and the decision matched that recommendation.
Braddan Local Plan Policy 2.4
limited scope for new retail businesses so where this is proposed this should generally be by conversion of existing properties
ites are areas of open land, in a rural area, on either side of the A25 at Oak Hill. They are both owned by Mr and Mrs C Atkinson. Site BH016, on the south side of the road, has an area of about 2.4ha. Its allocation was sought for development with a single dwelling. Site BH017, on the north side of the road, has an area of about 15ha. Its allocation was sought for the development of five dwellings. 444 My attention was drawn to Section 8.8 of the Strategic Plan, which concerns the possibility of adding to existing groups of houses in the countryside. I deal with that matter in paragraphs 237 to 240 above. 445 Strategic Policy 2 of the Strategic Plan states that new development will be located primarily within existing towns or villages, or, where appropriate, in sustainable extensions to those settlements. Development in the countryside will be permitted only in defined exceptional circumstances, none of which appear to apply in either of the present cases. In my view, the proposed allocation of Sites BH016 and BH017 would be contrary to this Strategic Plan policy, as they are neither in an existing settlement, nor in a sustainable extension to such a settlement. Development on either of these sites would detract from the rural character of this area. Prospective residents would have to travel some distance for a range of everyday activities, and would probably be heavily reliant on car transport, contrary to Strategic Policy 10 of the Strategic Plan. Accordingly, I recommend that no action be taken in response to these objections. Site BH021 - Ballaveare Farm, Old Castletown Road, Port Soderick 446 This undeveloped site of about 1.15ha is zoned as open space (agricultural) in the Braddan Local Plan 1991. It is not within, or close to, any of the settlements listed in Spatial Policies 1 to 4 of the Strategic Plan. However, it is within a loose knit scatter of sporadic residential development along Old Castletown Road. I note that in the past, planning approvals have been granted for the replacement of dwellings in this area with larger residential buildings. The objector, Mrs G Kingston, sought the allocation of Site BH021 for residential development, citing Section 8.8 of the Strategic Plan, which deals with 'Groups of Houses in the Countryside'. 447 The draft Area Plan identifies no 'Groups of Houses in the Countryside' in which additional housing is proposed, and I set out my general conclusions and recommendation with regard to this matter in paragraphs 237 to 240 above. Strategic Policy 2, Spatial Policy 5 and Housing Policy 4 of the Strategic Plan each state that new housing will be permitted in the countryside only in specified exceptional circumstances, none of which apply to Site BH021. I consider this site to be in the countryside. Accordingly, I do not support its allocation for residential development. I recommend that no action be taken in response to this objection. Site BH022 - Colooney's Road, Braddan 448 Site BH022 is an undeveloped area of about 1.7ha, lying to the west of the junction between Cooil Road and Colooney's Road. There is an existing dwelling, 'Glebe Cottage', immediately to the west of this crossroads. On its south-eastern side, the site has a frontage to Colooney's Road. On the opposite side of Colooney's Road, there are two or three residential properties, and then open fields. To the south-west and north-west the site abuts open countryside. To the north-east, it has a frontage to the A24, beyond which is open countryside. The site is outside the Existing Settlement Boundary of Douglas as shown in the draft Area Plan. 449 The promoters of this site, Ellis Brown, revised their original proposal and sought the allocation of plots for three dwellings, along part of the site's frontage to Colooney's Road, adjacent to 'Glebe Cottage'; and the extension of the settlement boundary to include these plots. They pointed out that residential development here would be close to public transport services; and would benefit from easy access, on foot of by bicycle, to the neighbouring employment areas in the Cooil Road and Nunnery corridors. It would also offer good access to Douglas, without the need to negotiate the congested Quarterbridge junction. It would be on the fringes of the existing Active Travel Zone, and would be within any future such zone, based on the Cooil Road employment area. Allocation of this site would provide an opportunity for the development of three individual, one-off houses, thereby adding to the choice of housing available. 450 These are cogent arguments. However, Site BH022 is in a rural area, and is not contiguous with the existing boundary of any settlement. Its development would consolidate a cluster of isolated buildings, rather than constitute the extension of an existing urban area. Strategic Policy 2 of the Strategic Plan states that new development will be located primarily within existing settlements, or in sustainable urban extensions to towns and villages; and that development in the countrys
Isle of Man Strategic Plan 2016: General Policy 2
General Policy 2: Development which is in accordance with the land-use zoning and proposals in the appropriate Area Plan and with other policies of this Strategic Plan will normally be permitted, provided that the development: (a) is in accordance with the design brief in the Area Plan where there is such a brief; (b) respects the site and surroundings in terms of the siting, layout, scale, form, design and landscaping of buildings and the spaces around them; (c) does not affect adversely the character of the surrounding landscape or townscape; (d) does not adversely affect the protected wildlife or locally important habitats on the site or adjacent land, including water courses; (e) does not affect adversely public views of the sea; (f) incorporates where possible existing topography and landscape features, particularly trees and sod banks; (g) does not affect adversely the amenity of local residents or the character of the locality; (h) provides satisfactory amenity standards in itself, including where appropriate safe and convenient access for all highway users, together with adequate parking, servicing and manoeuvring space; (i) does not have an unacceptable effect on road safety or traffic flows on the local highways; (j) can be provided with all necessary services; (k) does not prejudice the use or development of adjoining land in accordance with the appropriate Area Plan; (l) is not on contaminated land or subject to unreasonable risk of erosion or flooding; (m) takes account of community and personal safety and security in the design of buildings and the spaces around them; and (n) is designed having due regard to best practice in reducing energy consumption. 6.3 Development outside of areas zoned for development
Condition 1
The development hereby approved shall be begun before the expiration of four years from the date of this decision notice.